Magnetic field due to two wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field at point P on the x-axis due to two parallel wires carrying currents in opposite directions. The magnetic field's y-component cancels out due to symmetry, leaving only the x-component. The correct formula for the magnetic field is derived using the superposition principle, with the x-component expressed in terms of the distance R and the angle θ. It is clarified that the magnetic field does indeed depend on both the x-axis distance and the distance d from the wires. The participants acknowledge and correct a misunderstanding regarding the dependence of the magnetic field on these variables.
Siune
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have wires like in the picture and we want to know the value of magnetic field as
function of x:

NOTE: We want to know the magnetic field at point P ( P is on +x axis ) ( Which is totally arbitary!) The picture is there for just to give the idea.

189576A.jpg


R is the distance from each wire to point P.

Homework Equations



H = \frac{I}{2 \pi R }

The Attempt at a Solution



Okey, so the currents are going in opposite ways. By the right hand rule we get the direction of the magnetic field due to each wire!

We notice that the y-component cancels out ( due to symmetry ), and that the magnetic field is only the x component due to each wire at point P.

So by superposition principle we get the magnetic field at point P on x -axis:

H = sin(\theta) \frac{ I }{ \pi R }

Now sin(\theta) is the angle between x-axis and the distance R from each wire.

So we get from trigonometry:

H = \frac{d \cdot I }{ \pi R^2}

H = \frac{d \cdot I }{ (x ^2 + d ^2 ) \pi }

Not sure if this is right? At least the units match ( A / m ), but... problem is:

My assigment gives us only the current I and the x -axis distance to point P? So I assume the right answer of the magnetic field at point P should be independent of d? But that doesn't make sense to me.

Sincerely yours,
Siune
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Siune said:
We notice that the y-component cancels out ( due to symmetry ), and that the magnetic field is only the x component due to each wire at point P.

So by superposition principle we get the magnetic field at point P on x -axis:

H = sin(\theta) \frac{ I }{ \pi R }

Now sin(\theta) is the angle between x-axis and the distance R from each wire.

If θ is the angle between the x-axis and R, make sure you are using the correct trig function for getting the x-component.
 
Hmm, as the distance vector R from one wire and magnetic field from same wire are perpendicular I get that the x component of magnetic field by that wire

so sin(\theta) = \frac{d}{R}

and

R^2 = x^2 + d^2
?
 
Sorry, my mistake. You are entirely correct. The answer does depend on both x and d.
 
No problem at all, wouldn't have been the first time I make the mistake on the easiest part of the problem. ^^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top