Magnetic field induced by time-dependent current through out space?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field induced by a time-dependent current flowing through an infinitely long straight wire in vacuum. Participants reference Maxwell's equations and the use of cylindrical coordinates to express the current density as a function of time. The challenge lies in handling the Dirac delta function when differentiating, which complicates the derivation of the vector potential. One participant suggests that Green's functions and Fourier transforms may provide a solution for the vector potential. A solution is ultimately found in Griffiths' textbook, indicating that the integration process is complex, especially for an infinitely long wire.
liumylife
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a infinitely-long straight line in vacuum goes through space, carrying a current which is time-dependent. What is the magnetic field induced by the curent?

B, vector, the magnetic field
E, vector, the electric field
J, vector, the current density
ρ, scalar, the charge density
t, time
μ0, permeability
ε0, permitivity
div, divergence ( of vector )
rot, curl or rotation ( of vector )
Δ, Laplacian operator
t, partial differential operator with respect to time
r^, θ^ and z^ are unit vectors of r, θ, z

Homework Equations



Maxwell's equations in vacuum:
div E = ρ / ε0
rot E = -∂t B
div B = 0
rot B = μ0 J + μ0ε0t E

Continuum equation:
div J = -∂t ρ

The Attempt at a Solution



Take the straight line as z axis, using cylindrical coordinate r, θ, z.
The current density should be J = I(t) δ(r) z^ where the I(t) is the current intensity changing with time, and δ(r) is 2-D Dirac delta function.
Taking the rotation of the last equation in M's equations, I have
-Δ B = μ0 rot J - (∂t)2 B,
the rot J term brings trouble, what do I get when differentiate delta funtion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would use the given current density to determine the vector potential \vec A
which is related to the B and E fields by:
\vec B = \nabla \times \vec A\vec E = - \frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}- \vec \nabla \phi

After the gauge choice div A = 0 i got after omitting constants, like c:
\square \vec A = \vec j + \vec \nabla (\nabla \vec j)

Write this out in your coordinate choice.
I think this can be solved easily for A using Green's functions and doing a Fourier transform. I haven't tried it out myself yet.

If anyone knows a better way, have at it, I'm interested as well.
 
Solution

I found the solution in Griffiths' book: Chap.10, (10.31), generalization of the Biot-Savart law.
 
Looks like a tough inegration to find A . Easy for a short wire, L << λ or r, but for an infinitely long one?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top