Magnetic field of an infinite current sheet : Amperes law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the magnetic field of an infinite current sheet using Ampere's law, with an emphasis on the correct application of surface current representation. Key points include the distinction between surface current (\vec{K}) and volume current density (\vec{J}), and the importance of defining a coordinate system to avoid confusion in calculations. The loop drawn for applying Ampere's law must be perpendicular to the current, as this ensures that the integral \vec{J} \cdot d\vec{s} is non-zero and accurately reflects the magnetic field's direction. Additionally, symmetry arguments are crucial in concluding that there is no magnetic field component perpendicular to the plane of the current sheet. The discussion highlights the necessity of careful consideration of geometry and symmetry in electromagnetic problems.
Nyasha
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I was asked to find the magnetic field of an infinite current sheet due to amperes law. Is my attempt to the solution correct ? The final answer is correct, but l am doubtful of how l got there.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
1. This is a surface current, so it would be represented by \vec{K} not \vec{J}.
2. How did \int\vec{J} \cdot d\vec{s} turn into \int\vec{J} \cdot d\vec{l}. d\vec{l} is a line element around the circuit, while d\vec{s} is an area element of the enclosed surface. You can't turn one into the other.
3. It helps to define a coordinate system, this way you can loose d\vec{l} in favor of \hat{x}dx, \hat{y}dy, or \hat{z}dz, and the same for d/vec{s}. This is will avoid confusion when trying to determine \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{l}. d/vec{l} is pointing in the opposite direction along C_2, not that
4. This is the most important part. The way you drew the loop, \vec{J}\cdot d/vec{s}=0. What that tells you is that there is no field parallel to the current.
5. The way you should have drawn the loop is so that the loop is perpendicular to the current. Then \vec{J}\cdot d\vec{s}=Kda and \int\vec{J}\cdot d\vec{s}=Kl. This tells you that the field is perpendicular to the surface current.
6. You can't assume that the field is parallel to the plane, so the C2 and C3 integrals aren't necessarily 0. What happens is that the fields are the same along both lines, but because they are in opposite directions, they cancel.

I have a few more things to say, but my laptop is running out of power, I'll continue in the morning.
 
7. You say B_1l=-B_2l but offer no explanation. The explanation is that, by the right hand rule, the components of the fields parallel to the plane and perpendicular to the current have opposite signs and symmetry says they have to have equal magnitudes.
8. You have to argue that by symmetry that there is no field perpendicular to the plane because there the uniform current distribution will cancel out everything except the component parallel to the plate and perpendicular to the the current.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top