Magnetic field of revolving disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the magnetic field along the axis of a rotating disk with charge density σ and radius R. The initial approach involves using fundamental equations like F=ILxB and the Biot-Savart law, with the charge q expressed as q=σπR². However, a key error identified is the assumption of constant force across varying radii, as both velocity and charge differ at different points on the disk. The corrected approach involves integrating the contributions of the magnetic field over the disk's surface, taking into account the surface current density. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of proper integration and variable consistency in deriving the magnetic field expression.
Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
find the expression for the magnetic field at a distance z on the axis which passes through the centre of a disk, with a radius of R, and a charge density σ, the disk is rotating at an anular velocity of ω.

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_H4Iz7SmBrbk/SivHVn0m_fI/AAAAAAAABC0/9sgJmbkoJK8/s720/Untitled.jpg

could someone tell me if this is all done correctly?

the equations i am going to use are
1)F=ILxB
2)f=qvxB
3)biot savar

1st stage i want to express the charge q,
q=σπR2

now i use
f=qvxB=σπR2vB ( the angle is 90 degrees constant)
f=σπR3

F is also ILB so i know that IL=σπR3ω

now using biot savar

dB=(μI*dlxr)/4πr3)

now for I*dl i want to substitute the expression i found earlier, with R being my variable, not that sure about this...

dB==(μσπR3ωdR)/4π((R2+z2)0.5)3)

dB=(μσR3ωdR)/4((R2+z2)1.5)

B=(μσω/4)*∫R3dR/(z2+R2)1.5

after integration i get

B=(μσω/4)*(1+z2/(z2+R2))*(z2+R2)0.5 with my limits being R from 0 to R

and eventually i get
B=(μσω/4)*[(1+z2/(z2+R2))*(z2+R2)0.5-2z]

i have never solved anything of this sort and hope everything i have done is okay, thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're pretty close, however your mistake is to assume that the force is constant for every r which it is not. F=qvB, but v and q are different at different radii. Therefore the total force would be \int_0^{2R} vBdq =\int_0^{2R} \omega r B 2 \pi r \sigma dr=\int_0^{2R} I B dr[/tex]. We&#039;re integrating over the same range and variable so the integrands need to be the same therefore.<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt; 2 \pi \sigma \omega r^2 B dr=I B dr \Rightarrow I dr= 2 \pi \sigma \omega r^2 dr&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> Then using Biot-Savart yields:<br /> &lt;br /&gt; \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \int_0^{2R} \frac{2 \pi \sigma \omega r^2}{r&amp;#039;^2} \cos \theta dr&lt;br /&gt;<br /> <br /> r&#039; is the distance from a point on the disk to the z-axis, r&amp;#039;^2=r^2+z^2. And \theta is the angle between r and r&#039;, so \cos \theta picks out the x component of the magnetic field.<br /> <br /> An easier way would be using the surface current density, K=\sigma v. Biot-Savart then becomes:<br /> &lt;br /&gt; \vec{B}(\vec{r})=\frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \int \frac{\vec{K} \times \hat{r}}{r^2}da&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top