Magnetic Field of wire carrying current

AI Thread Summary
A wire bent into an equilateral triangle generates a magnetic field at its center, with the magnetic field vector from each side pointing in the same direction. The initial calculation yielded B = 1.5uI/(pi*L), while the correct answer is B = 4.5uI/(pi*L), indicating a discrepancy by a factor of three. The confusion arose from interpreting the length L versus the side length L, which affects the calculations. Attempts to use the Biot-Savart law and Ampere's Law also led to incorrect results. Clarification on the dimensions used in the calculations is essential for arriving at the correct magnetic field value.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
A wire carrying a current I is bent into the shape of an equilateral triangle of side L. Find the magnitude of the magnetic field at the center of the triangle.

Since the vector of the magnetic field in respect to each side of the triangle points in the same direction at the center, I should be able to find the magnetic field generated by one side of the triangle and multiply it by 3. After trying several times, I keep getting
B = 1.5uI/(pi*L), in which u = permeability of of free space...but the actual answer is
B = 4.5uI/(pi*L), which is 3 times greater than my answer. After looking over my work, nothing seems to be wrong...but my answer is down by a factor of 3 from the one I'm supposed to get. What am I doing wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe you are not multiplying it by 3 as you said you would...
 
Nah...I have...still doesn't come out right. I'm pretty sure I've done things right...maybe the question meant length L rather than side L...with that, I actually get the right answer.
 
Well.. i tried doing it... For a triangle, you get the perpendicular distance from a side to the centroid to be:

<br /> \frac{L}{2} \tan{\left(\frac{\pi}{6}\right)}<br />

on using B = \frac{\mu_o I}{2 \pi r}

i'm getting

<br /> B = \frac{1.724 \mu_o I}{\pi L}<br />

and for three sides I'm getting it as:

<br /> B = \frac{5.16 \mu_o I}{\pi L}<br />

which is again.. not the right answer?
 
Last edited:
Hmmm...I suppose it really just might be length L instead of side L...oh well...
 
Gear300 said:
Hmmm...I suppose it really just might be length L instead of side L...oh well...

are you sure we can approximate the magnetic field using the formula we've used? If not try using the Biot-Savart law and see what comes up.
 
Thats actually the formula I used...I'm sure I also checked earlier with Ampere's Law...
 
Back
Top