Magnetic fields and inter stella medium

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic fields in the interstellar medium are produced through two main theories: primordial magnetic fields from the early universe and the galactic dynamo theory. The primordial fields are thought to be compressed by baryonic collapse, while the dynamo theory suggests that turbulent motions amplify magnetic fields in a preferred direction. However, relying solely on either theory does not fully align with observational data, indicating a combination of both may be necessary. References provided include works by Lyman Spitzer and Russel Kulsrud, along with several online resources for further reading. Understanding these processes is deemed crucial for advancing knowledge in astrophysics.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Can anyone point me to some reference as to how magnetic fields are
produced in the inter stella medium please.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't know much about the subject myself, but I suggest either "Physical Processes of the Interstellar Medium" by Lyman Spitzer (only small parts about magnetic fields) or "Plasma Physics for Astrophysics" by Russel Kulsrud.
 
Thanks Space tiger, i think this is a under rated topic, and think it needs
more understanding, if anyone has a deep understanding on this, i would
be greatful to hear from them.
 
wolram said:
Can anyone point me to some reference as to how magnetic fields are
produced in the inter stella medium please.
Here are a few good links on that:

http://astronomy.sussex.ac.uk/~petert/ism2/magfield.pdf

http://www.bao.ac.cn/bao/hjl/xian/proceedings/Katia/fin/Katia.pdf

http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/fulltext?format=application/pdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Aastro-ph%2F0012301

http://www.aas.org/publications/baas/v36n5/aas205/1306.htm

http://flux.aps.org/meetings/BAPSMAY96/abs/S1335004.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As far as I know there are two possibilites, and probably a combination of both leads to the generation of magnetic fields in galaxies. The first one assumes that the origin of galatic magnetic fields are primordial magnetic fields in the universe before galaxy formation. The collapse and compression of baryons would have compressed the line fields also, increasing the field strength (it is assumed that the field lines are ‘frozen’ and bound to the barionic gas). The second one is the theory of the galactic dynamo and assumes that the magnetic fields are generated due to turbulent motions which amplify in a preferred direction. As far as I know the first option alone leads to magnetic fields which are too strong compared with observations, and the second option alone leads to magnetic fields which are too weak in newborn galaxies, compared with observations.
 
Thanks Lab guy, lots of lovely reading, should keep me busy for a while.
thanks also Hellfire.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top