Magnetic flux density vs magnetic flux

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic flux, measured in webers, represents the total magnetic field passing through a surface, while magnetic flux density, measured in teslas, indicates the strength of the magnetic field at a specific point. The relationship between the two is defined by the integral of magnetic flux density over a surface area. Magnetic flux density is often referred to as the magnetic field and is distinct from magnetic flux, meaning they cannot be used interchangeably. Additionally, there is a discussion about the relationship between magnetic flux density and voltage, with formulas indicating how changes in voltage, area, and coil turns affect flux density. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping electromagnetic principles.
chanderjeet
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
i'm having trouble distinguishing between magnetic flux and magnetic flux density...can someone please explain to me?

also why is it sometimes used interchangeably?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi chanderjeet! :smile:

Magnetic flux, Φ, is a scalar, measured in webers (or volt-seconds), and is a total amount measured across a surface (ie, you don't have flux at a point).

Magnetic flux density, B, is a vector, measured in webers per square metre (or teslas), and exists at each point.

The flux across a surface S is the integral of the magnetic flux density over that surface:
Φ = ∫∫S B.dS
(and is zero for a closed surface)

Magnetic flux density is what physicists more commonly call the magnetic field. :rolleyes:

It is a density per area, rather than the usual density per volume.

(and they can't be used interchangeably)

Similarly, electric flux is a scalar, measured in volt-metres, and electric flux density (also a density per area), E, is a vector, measured in volts per metre (and is more commonly called the electric field).​
 
  • Like
Likes Iris Kim and 21joanna12
that really cleared things up...thank you.
 
There is also H, magnetization, measured in amp-turns per meter (in MKS units).

Bob S
 
Some sources say that magnetic flux density is not related to current but to VOLTAGE. I don't understand why. I always thought that the magnetic field in a wire is caused by the movement of charged elements (e.g electrons) in a wire. Can you explain this?
 
In some litterature this formula is used:

Bmax = Vmax/ (2*pi*f * A * n)

Where Bmax is the max magnetic flux density, Vmax is the max voltage over a coil with n turns wound on a toroid core with area A. 2*pi*f is the rate of voltage change per time unit.

It looks like the magnetic flux density is reduced :

If we increase the number of turns. Why?
If we increase the area. Why?
If we increase the rate of change of voltage applied. Why?

It looks like the magnetic flux density is increased:
If the max VOLTAGE is increased. Why? Isnt it the current that causes the flux density to increase?

I would appreciate a thorough and intuitive explanation!

Mike Hansen
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top