Magnetic Flux Quanta - Definition & Animation

mnada
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
What is "Magnetic flux quanta"? is there any animation describing this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is what it says it is, quantized flux.
The "typical" situation for this to occur would be superconducting ring, where you will find that the flux through the ring is quantized, meaning it is periodic, with phi_0 being h/2e.

This also gives rise to Abrikosov vortices (quantized "flux tubes") in type II superconductors. If you want to see some movies showing the movement of these you can just search for "vortex" and "superconductor" on Youtube.
 
Thanks for your reply, and please forgive my ignorance. I have read some sentences on wikipedia but unfortunately they all were repelling each other I couldn't understand a thing. Does this "Magnetic flux quanta" mean that Magnetic flux of say a wire carrying current can only take some discrete values? or this quantization happen only in case of interaction with superconductor materials?
What brought me here is that I am reading on "A Superconduction quantum interference device or SQUID". I can say that these are the parts of physics where reality is mixed with science fiction and It could be sometimes hard to understand.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top