Magnetic Flux through a Closed Surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the total magnetic flux through a closed surface using the divergence theorem, concluding that the flux is zero due to the divergence of the magnetic field B being zero. Participants express confusion about the influence of an electric field E on magnetic flux, with some suggesting that a time-dependent electric field could affect the magnetic flux. However, it is clarified that if the electric field is only position-dependent, it should not impact the flux. The conversation references Maxwell's equations, emphasizing that while magnetic fields can change due to electric fields, the total magnetic flux across a closed surface remains zero. The relationship between changing electric fields and magnetic flux is acknowledged, indicating a complex interplay in dynamic scenarios.
TH93
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the divergence theorem, evaluate the total flux of a magnetic field B(r) across the
surface S enclosing a finite, connected volume of space V, and discuss its possible
dependence on the presence of an electric field E(r).

Homework Equations



∇.B=0

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part was pretty straightforward. Using the Maxwell equation in conjunction with the divergence theorem, it is easy to see that the magnetic flux across a closed surface is 0. The next part somewhat confuses me. My initial thought is that the divergence of B being 0 holds for all cases and therefore the presence of an electric field should have no bearing on the magnetic flux. However, I am not 100% sure though. Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing I could think of for the second part is that a changing electric field produces a magnetic field which would, obviously, affect the magnetic flux across the surface...
 
In what way does this happen? Would that mean a time dependant E field would produce a case in which the divergence of B is not 0. Surely for a closed surface this would not be possible?

In the question itself, the E field mentioned is only dependant on position so a time dependant case is irrelevant.
 
If the E field is strictly dependent upon position, I'm pretty sure that there is no way that it could affect the flux. But please don't rely on my answer alone. I'm by no means an expert in Electrodynamics
 
Well the magnetic flux describes the TOTAL flux through the surface. There is still magnetic fields flowing out of the surface, but because no monopoles exist, the flux has to equal 0 because the same amount that exist also enters. Referring to amperes law ∇ x B = \frac{∂D}{∂t} + J That saying that the magnetic flux is equal to the change of the electric field over time. So if you have a changing magnetic field inside the closed surface, you also have magnetic flux. And that's why i think its dependent on the presence of an electric field. And since ∇ . E = \frac{∑Q}{ε} It doesn't matter where it is.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Thread 'Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem'
Hi, I'm stuck at this question, please help. Attempt to the Conducting Sphere and Dipole Problem (a) Electric Field and Potential at O due to Induced Charges $$V_O = 0$$ This potential is the sum of the potentials due to the real charges (##+q, -q##) and the induced charges on the sphere. $$V_O = V_{\text{real}} + V_{\text{induced}} = 0$$ - Electric Field at O, ##\vec{E}_O##: Since point O is inside a conductor in electrostatic equilibrium, the electric field there must be zero...
Back
Top