Magnetic flux through smaller coil within solenoid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic flux through a smaller coil located within a solenoid and determining the mutual inductance between the two coils. The magnetic field (B) inside the solenoid is calculated using the formula B = μ₀ * n * I, yielding a value of 0.01641 T. The magnetic flux through the smaller coil is then computed using the formula flux = B x A, but the correct area for the smaller coil must account for its 50 turns. Participants emphasize the need to incorporate the number of turns in the smaller coil when calculating the total magnetic flux. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying formulas and understanding the relationship between the solenoid and the smaller coil.
jdubt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solenoid has 235 turns of wire wrapped along its length of 27 cm. The diameter of the solenoid is 1.5 cm. In the middle of the solenoid is a smaller coil of diameter 1.0 cm with 50 turns of wire along its 2.0 cm length. The two coils are coaxial. A current of 15 A is in the larger solenoid with no current in the smaller coil.
(a) Determine the magnetic flux through the smaller coil.
(b) Determine the mutual inductance of the pair of coils.

Homework Equations


B= mu_not *n*I
flux =B x A


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried several times with no success. My problem is I don't know how to relate the solenoid to the smaller coil.

B= 4* pi *10^-7*(235/.27)*15 = .01641 T

I believe this is correct but I don't know where to go from here.

flux = (.01641 T)* pi * (.0075)^2

This could be an intermediary step in getting the flux of the smaller coil, but I don't know what to afterwards.

flux = (.01641 T)* pi * (.005)^2

This is incorrect.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your 0.01641 T calculation.

Hmmm ... your flux expression seems right for a single-loop coil, but they give 50 turns for the smaller coil.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top