Magnetic force of two parallel wires is inverse proportional to distance?

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic force between two parallel wires is inversely proportional to the distance between them, following an inverse relationship similar to 1/r in two dimensions. This differs from the inverse square law seen in three-dimensional scenarios. As the distance increases, the force behaves more like 1/r^2 at very large separations. For practical examples, two wires 1 km long and 1 cm apart exhibit a force that closely aligns with 1/r. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping magnetic interactions in different dimensional contexts.
ctech4285
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Its right.

The inverse X laws are different in different dimensions. Two infinite parallel wires is a lot like a 2-D problem where its usually the "inverse-r" law.
 
ah that makes sense, thanks! 1d -> r; 2d -> 1/r; 3d -> 1/r`2
 
To complete your 3D understanding of this, imagine two wires 1km long separated by 1cm.

For these wires, as they are separated the force will go very nearly as 1/r. When they are about 1km apart it will not be 1/r or 1/r^2 but something in between. When they are a million km apart the force will go very nearly as 1/r^2.

(1D goes as a constant or 1/r^0)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top