Magnetic force on a curved conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total magnetic force on a semi-circular conductor carrying a counterclockwise current in an outward magnetic field. The initial approach simplified the force calculation by assuming it was perpendicular to the conductor, leading to an incorrect total force of πIBR. The correct method involves breaking the force into x and y components, allowing for proper vector addition, which results in the total force being 2IBR. This highlights the importance of considering vector components when dealing with forces in different directions. Understanding vector addition is crucial for accurately determining the resultant force in such scenarios.
carnot cycle
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the total magnetic force on the semi-circular part of the conductor. There is a current I running counterclockwise through the semi-circle. The magnetic field B is out of the page.

Homework Equations


F = Il x B
l = Rθ
dl = Rdθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the force is anywhere perpendicular to the conductor, so I disregarded the cross product and used F = IlB, where l is the length of the conductor. So,

dF = IBdl = IBRdθ

I then went ahead and integrated the dθ (upper limit: pi, lower limit: zero) and retrieved an answer of pi*IBR for the total force.

The book states that the answer is 2*IBR, and they get this answer by breaking up the dF force into an x-component IBRcosθdθ and a y-component IBRsinθdθ and then integrating these two components from lower limit of zero to upper limit of pi. Why is it necessary to break the dF into x and y components and integrating these components, rather than just integrating the total force dF? I've thought about it for a while but can't figure out why my method was incorrect. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 626
Physics news on Phys.org
The force on each element is a vector. The total force is the sum of vectors for all elements.

When adding vectors, the magnitude of the result is not generally equal to the sum of the magnitudes of each vector. But the x-component of the result is equal to the sum of the x-components of the vectors, etc.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top