Magnetic Force on A Curved Current Carrying Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic force on a curved current-carrying wire along the equator of a sphere. The original question seeks clarification on whether the magnetic force on the curved wire can be equated to that of a straight wire of the same length, given a uniform horizontal magnetic field. It is noted that the book's claim about the forces being equal likely depends on specific assumptions about the magnetic field's uniformity and orientation. The magnetic field is confirmed to be uniform and horizontal, which is crucial for the calculations. Understanding these parameters is essential for accurately determining the magnetic force on the curved wire.
astralboy15
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, just a quick question. I'm working through a problem in my physics book and I am asked to find the magnetic force on a current carrying wire that runs along the equator of a sphere. So the wire is not straight, but curves along with the sphere, off the surface of it (not levitating).

My book also mentions that the magnetic force on a curved current carrying wire is the same as the magnetic force on a straight wire connecting the either end with the same current.

My question is this:


Am I to assume that if I only have the CURVED portion of wire (there is nothing connecting either end) that I could simply find the magnetic force of a straight wire of the same length and they would have the same magnetic force acting on them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on the magnetic field, which you haven't told us anything about. The claim the book makes about the forces being equal probably relies on assumptions about the magnetic field, like it being uniform and the wires lying in a plane perpendicular to the field.
 
Ok, true, my bad - forgot to put that bit in. The magnetic field is uniform. It is also horizontal.
Think of the curved portion of the wire (elevated, not levitated, along the sphere) then the magnetic field running uniformly beneath it in a horizontal plane. In other words, look at this, +, and imagine this being a cartesian coordinate system: the magnetic force is running from -y to y (in a horizontal plane), the wire curves along the sphere with current running -x to x.

hope this helps. thanks guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top