Magnetic motor (contradicts 2nd law of thermodynamic? )

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a magnetic motor, which appears to operate as a perpetual motion machine by using the attraction of magnets to create continuous motion. However, participants clarify that this design contradicts the second law of thermodynamics, as it cannot generate energy without an external input. The magnets do not provide energy to sustain motion; instead, the system loses energy to friction, leading to a gradual slowdown. The notion of "free energy" is also questioned, as it implies a misunderstanding of energy conservation principles. Overall, the consensus is that perpetual motion is impossible, and the magnetic motor cannot function as claimed.
mathsTKK
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone ! I am a new member to PF but I find it helpful as people will give ideas and suggestions for me :)

Recently,I come across something called as a magnetic motor. From the design, a few permanent magnets are placed on the edge of a circular disk. Then, as another magnet approaches the disk, the disk spins due to the attraction between the magnet. Due to continuous magnetic attraction, the disk seems able to spin forever, like a perpetual motion machine. However, I realize that the 2nd law of thermodynamics does not allow perpetual motion. So, does the magnetic motor contradict with this law? Besides, I always come across the term ' free energy' which raises my doubt whether it's truly 'free'?

I hope that PF members can help me to clear my doubt. I am truly eager to know the physics and logic behind this contradiction.

Thank you everyone ^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! Unfortunately discussion of perpetual motion machines is not allowed here on PF due to the tendency for the discussions to get out of hand with crackpottery and nonsense. I will say that you have forgotten that when magnets attract each other they don't simply stop attracting after they pass by each other, so the disk has no way to spin past each magnet with more energy than someone was to give it initially. No power can be produced. No violation of the 2nd law.
 
'so the disk has no way to spin past each magnet with more energy than someone was to give it initially'

I don't really get the reason behind actually. Would you mind explain the sentence above? My doubt is why will the disk spin faster and faster if no energy is used to do that? Is magnet the one which provides this energy? Then,if there's a continuous attraction between the permanent magnet on the disk and the magnet near the disk, will the disk spin forever?

Thank you for your explanation :)
 
It won't spin faster. The magnets will attract each other equally as they get closer to each other and as they get further away. There is no net acceleration, the disk will simply spin down as it loses energy to friction.
 
Back
Top