Magnetic Vector Potential and conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the vector potential inside a straight current-carrying conductor of radius R, specifically showing that it equals zero at the conductor's edge. Participants suggest using cylindrical coordinates to analyze how current varies with radius and recommend converting the line integral into an area integral for simplification. The Biot-Savart Law is noted as less efficient, with a preference for applying the local form of Maxwell's Equations to solve the problem. The key equations involve the relationship between the vector potential and magnetic field, emphasizing the importance of proper differentiation in cylindrical coordinates. Overall, the conversation centers on effective methods to approach the problem of calculating the magnetic vector potential.
sikrut
Messages
48
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that, inside a straight current-carrying conductor of radius R, the vector potential is:
$$ \vec{A} = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{4\pi}(1-\frac{s^2}{R^2}) $$

so that ##\vec{A}## is set equal to zero at s = R

Homework Equations



## \vec{A} = \frac{\mu_{0}}{4\pi}\int\frac{\vec{I}}{|r'-r|} dl' ##


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really having a hard time even setting it up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by drawing a picture of a current carrying wire with a significant radius.
How does the current vary with radius?
 
Hint: cylindrical coordinates.
Some people like to turn the line integral into an area integral too ... there are lots of approaches.
For marking - it is usually best to use the method covered in class.
 
Another hint: The Biot-Savart Law is not very efficient in many problems. It's easier to use the local form of the (magnetostatic) Maxwell Equations:
\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}=\mu_0 \vec{j}, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0.
The second equation ("no monopoles") is already solved by the introduction of the vector potential, cf.
\vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}.
So, just take the appropriate derivatives (in cylindrical coordinates), and check that you get the right current density.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top