Magnetig flux of a straight conductor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kruum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conductor Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic flux of a straight conductor using the formula B = (μ₀/2πr)I. Participants debate whether to integrate over the entire area at once or divide it into sections due to its non-rectangular shape. It is suggested that symmetry can simplify the integration process. The consensus leans towards dividing the area into three pieces for easier calculation. Overall, the approach emphasizes the importance of considering different ranges along the wire for accurate integration.
Kruum
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://www.aijaa.com/img/b/00815/3678868.jpg

Homework Equations



B= \frac { \mu _0}{2 \pi r}I
d \phi = \vec{B} \cdot d \vec {A}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the magnetic field of the conductor is B= \frac { \mu _0}{2 \pi r}I. And in order to solve the magnetic flux I need to integrate d \phi = \vec{B} \cdot d \vec {A}. But the question is, since the area is not square or rectangular, can I simply integrate over the whole area at once or do I need to cut the integral into pieces?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kruum said:

Homework Statement



Homework Equations



B= \frac { \mu _0}{2 \pi r}I
d \phi = \vec{B} \cdot d \vec {A}

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the magnetic field of the conductor is B= \frac { \mu _0}{2 \pi r}I. And in order to solve the magnetic flux I need to integrate d \phi = \vec{B} \cdot d \vec {A}. But the question is, since the area is not square or rectangular, can I simply integrate over the whole area at once or do I need to cut the integral into pieces?

You will have different ranges along the wire that you will need to consider in the integral. Symmetry should make it easier to account for.

Let's consider this Introductory still?
 
LowlyPion said:
You will have different ranges along the wire that you will need to consider in the integral. Symmetry should make it easier to account for.

So what your saying is, that I should divide the cross into three pieces and integrate them separately? So the first integral would be from r to r+b over the area of ab. The second from r+b to r+b+a over the area of (a+2b)a. And the third one from r+b+a to r+2b+a over the area of ab.
 
Kruum said:
So what your saying is, that I should divide the cross into three pieces and integrate them separately? So the first integral would be from r to r+b over the area of ab. The second from r+b to r+b+a over the area of (a+2b)a. And the third one from r+b+a to r+2b+a over the area of ab.

3 rectangles sounds good to me.

Slice them horizontally or vertically, which ever way your Ginsu slices the easiest.
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top