Magnetism (Charge, E-field, potential difference, mass) - A bit confused

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a charged particle moving through parallel plates in a magnetic field. The particle travels at a speed of 1.9 x 106 m/s and experiences a magnetic field of 0.2 T. The potential difference (V) between the plates is calculated to be 2280 V using the equation E = vBL. The charge-to-mass ratio (q/m) is derived as 9.5 x 107 C/kg, indicating a negative charge based on the direction of forces acting on the particle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetism principles, specifically Lorentz force.
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule for determining force directions.
  • Knowledge of equations related to electric fields and potential difference.
  • Basic concepts of circular motion and centripetal force.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force equation F = q(E + v x B).
  • Learn about the right-hand rule and its applications in electromagnetism.
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field strength (E) and potential difference (V) in parallel plate capacitors.
  • Explore the concept of charge-to-mass ratio in different particles, including protons and electrons.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and particle dynamics, as well as anyone preparing for exams involving these concepts.

twotaileddemon
Messages
258
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v696/talimtails/PP23.jpg

A particle with unknown mass and charge moves with a constant speed v = 1.9 x 10^6 m/s as it passes undeflected through a pair of parallel plates, as shown above. The plates are separated by a distance d = 6.0 x 10^-3 m, and a constant potential difference V is maintained between them. A uniform magnetic field of magnitude B = .2 T directed into the page exists both between the plates and in a region to the right of them as shown. After the particle passes into the region to the right of the plates where only the magnetic field exists, its trajectory is circular with radius .1 m.

a. What is the sign of the charge of the particle? Justify your answer.
b. On the diagram, clearly indicate the direction of the electric field between the plates. Justify your answer.
c. Determine the magnitude of the potential difference V between th plates.
d. Determine the ratio of the charge to the mass (q/m) of the particle.

Homework Equations


B = kI/r
F = qvBsin*
F = BIL sin*
V = IR
V = Er
F = qE
E = Blv
F = mv^2/r (centripetal force should act on the particle after its trajectory becomes circular)


The Attempt at a Solution



a. I am not sure how I would be able to determine this, honestly. Could anyone give me something to ponder about that might help me solve this?

b. Using the right hand rule, if the B is directed into the page, the force is down and current is to the left. If the force is down, then the electric field will be down as will if the charge is positive, or up if the charge is negative.

c. If I used E = V/r and E = vBL, I could say that V = vBLr, which are the 4 unknown's that I have (L being replaced by d)

d. The mass and charge could be determined by F = qvB = mv^2/r, but that would give me two unknown's. However, I was wondering, if the charge was positive or negative, could I just use the mass of a proton or electron (or even neutron) for the mass and solve for the charge from the above equation (and then finding the ratio)?

Thanks for any help at all :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the current is to the left, then what is the sign of the moving charge? If the magnetic force is down, then in what direction does the electric force act? The electric field?

You should be able to solve for the field and then the voltage for part c

Part d is only asking for the value of q/m, which you can put in terms of everything else

Keep in mind that nowhere does the problem state that the particle is either a proton or electron, it could be anything with charge and mass
 
If the current is to the left, and the charge is able to resist the current and go to the right, would it be negative because it is going in the opposite direction? There is no resistance, otherwise I would say the charge is positive since it would go against the current through a resistor.

The electric field should act, if the charge is indeed negative, up above the page. I'm not sure how to find electric force though...

Using E = vBL, I get (1.9 x 10^6 m/s)(.2 T)(6 x 10^-3 m) = 2280 V

And for the last part, I need a ratio. But, even so, I could get q/m on one side of the equation

q/m = v^2/rvB -> v/rB -> (1.9x10^6)/(.1 m x .2 T) = 1.9 x 10^6 / .02, which gives me a 95 mil:1 ratio.. which can't be right. Am I supposed to use the distance between the magnetic plates?

And.. thanks for your help ^^;;
 
twotaileddemon said:
The electric field should act, if the charge is indeed negative, up above the page. I'm not sure how to find electric force though...

The sum of the forces is zero, which means that the electric force acts upward. If the charge is negative, which direction is the field?

Using E = vBL, I get (1.9 x 10^6 m/s)(.2 T)(6 x 10^-3 m) = 2280 V

You get the same answer by summing up the forces
Fm = Fe = qvB = qE
E = vB
V = El = vBl

And what makes you think your ratio is wrong? Compare the charge to mass ratio of an electron with what you found
 
If the charge is negative, and the electric force is upward, then the electric field is downward. Okay.. I can see why.

I just thought that the ratio was so big I made some huge error.. =/
But looking at the mass of an electron, it's charge to mass ratio is even greater than in this equation.. so I guess I shouldn't complain

Honestly.. thanks again ^^;;
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K