Magnetism, Gravity and Critical Momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of "critical momentum" in relation to magnetism and gravity, proposing that there exists a threshold velocity that can overcome magnetic and gravitational attractions between objects. It suggests that if one magnet is thrown away from another with sufficient speed, it will escape the magnetic pull, similar to how galaxies can move apart if they exceed a certain escape velocity. The idea posits that beyond a specific distance, both magnetic and gravitational forces become negligible. Participants question the implications of this theory for understanding the universe's expansion and the calculation of escape velocities. The conversation ultimately seeks clarity on the relationship between momentum, distance, and the forces at play in cosmic dynamics.
PRD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please consider the following…

Suppose you were on a space-walk at the International Space Station and you had two refrigerator magnets. And suppose you gently released one magnet so that it remained “stationary” in space. And suppose you threw the second magnet as hard as you could in the direction beyond the solar system. Which of the following two scenarios would happen?…

1. The momentum of the second magnet would be so great that it would overcome the magnetic attraction between the two magnets and the two magnets would move away from each other forever.

Or,

2. The magnetic force between the two magnets (even though may be infinitesimally small at great distances) would be strong enough to slow the second magnet down and one day the two magnets would come back together again.

For what it’s worth my vote is for option one. If two magnets are moving away from each other there is a “critical momentum” (or escape velocity) which if exceeded will overcome the magnetic attraction between the two magnets and they will move away from each other forever. In effect, there is a certain distance beyond which the magnetic attraction between the two magnets becomes “zero“.

I postulate that exactly the same thing holds true for gravity. If two galaxies are moving away from each other there is a “critical momentum” (or escape velocity) which if exceeded will overcome the gravitational attraction between the two galaxies and they will move away from each other forever. In effect, there is a certain distance beyond which the gravitational attraction between the two galaxies becomes “zero“.

So what do you think? If in fact there is such a thing as a “critical momentum” it could explain the ever-expanding nature of the universe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't get it.

If you can derive the escape velocity of an object from the surface of a planet (and this a common intro physics exercise), then couldn't you just work backwards and figure out the minimum velocity from whatever the starting point that you want to use? So what am I missing here?

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top