What Are the True Origins of Magnetism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhe1984
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
Earth's magnetism is theorized to originate from generator-like chambers where chemicals mix to create a giant electromagnet. The fundamental source of magnetism is linked to electrons, specifically through quantum effects like spin and the Pauli exclusion principle, which generate magnetic dipole moments. There are three main types of magnetism: ferromagnetism, diamagnetism, and paramagnetism, with ferromagnetism being the most commonly observed. Ferromagnetic materials can retain magnetization after an external magnetic field is removed, a phenomenon known as hysteresis, while diamagnetism and paramagnetism require an external field to manifest. Photons do not possess magnetic properties, but positrons, which are positively charged, do exhibit magnetic characteristics, highlighting the interconnectedness of electricity and magnetism.
jhe1984
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
So these Earth's magnetism is supposedly produced inside these generator-like chambers inside of which various chemicals are mixing to form some sort of giant electromagnet, in theory, right?

But whether this is or isn't true, where does magnetism come from at its root? Do photons have magnetism?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is unknown to the cause of the Earth's magnetic field. Is it the Peltier-Seebeck effect? http://en.wikipedia.org/Peltier-Seebeck_effect

Where does magnetism arise from? Electrons.

There are different types of magnetism, lucky for you, the three main being: Diamagnetism, Paramagnets, and Ferromagnetism. We'll go backwards.

Ferromagnetism is the kind you normally observe. Refrigerator magnets, speaker magnets, wallet magnets, permanent magnets.

Ferromagnetism is due to the direct influence of two quantum effects: quantum spin, and the Pauli exclusion principle.
The spin of an electron, (something you can't visualize correctly) combined with its orbital angular momentum, results in a magnetic dipole moment and creates a magnetic field. (if you need to, you can imagine the electrons spinning around). The dipoles tend to align spontaneously, without any applied field.

Ferromagnetism manifests itself in the fact that a small externally imposed magnetic field, say from a solenoid, can cause the magnetic domains to line up with each other and the material is said to be magnetized. The driving magnetic field will then be increased by a large factor which is usually expressed as a relative permeability for the material. Ferromagnets will stay magnetized after having been aligned to this exterior magnetic field. Called hysteresis. The fraction of the saturation magnetization which is retained when the driving field is removed is called the remanence of the material.

All ferromagnets have a maximum temperature where the ferromagnetic property disappears as a result of thermal agitation -- the Curie temperature. You know that heat is actually just the atoms shaking around, after the atoms shake around enough they aren't all aligned the same way!

So really, all the electrons are "spinning" the same way, and that creates the field.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...sol/domain.gif

Diamagnetism is a very weak form of magnetism, that needs another magnetic field to work. It is the result of changes in the orbital motion of electrons. Diamagnetism is repelling. Diamagnetism is found in all materials; however, because it is so weak it can only be observed in materials that do not exhibit other forms of magnetism. Some diamagnetic materials that should be recognized are water, pyrolitic graphite, and superconductors.
http://www.exploratorium.edu/snacks/diamagnetism_www/

Paramagnetism is closely related to diamagnetism, and also needs an external magnetic field. It occurs temporarily, when its magnetic dipoles align with the external field. Some paramagnetic materials that should be known are oxygen, aluminum, and sodium.

Photons are not magnetic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for answering! One last question.

Does a positron have magnetic properties?
 
Yes, positrons have an electric charge of +1. Do you understand that "electricity and magnetism are two sides of the same coin?"
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top