Magnetism question regarding solenoids and shapes of their cores

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter schuurthing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism Shapes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and functionality of a solenoid electromagnet with a specific core shape. Participants explore the implications of the core's geometry on magnetic field strength and polarity, as well as practical considerations for construction and measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the inner edges of the core gap would exhibit different polarities and expresses concern about the impact of the iron core on the magnetic field.
  • Another participant suggests that the design would be efficient and that the magnetic field would be strong across the gap.
  • A participant mentions using a calculator to optimize the solenoid's design and seeks to understand the relationship between gauss measurements and holding force.
  • One reply indicates that the actual strength of the magnet may exceed calculator estimates and notes the complexity of calculating forces from field strength.
  • Another participant shares a personal experience with a similar magnet design and emphasizes the importance of equal cross-sectional areas for optimal performance.
  • There is a discussion about whether the inner pole of the magnet needs to be solid or can be hollow, with some suggesting that the gap can be filled with non-magnetic material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the design specifics and performance characteristics of the solenoid electromagnet. There is no clear consensus on the necessity of a solid inner pole versus a hollow one, nor on the implications of the core's gap.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of magnet design and the limitations of existing calculators for predicting performance based on specific shapes and sizes. There are unresolved questions regarding the exact relationship between magnetic field strength and practical measurements.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electromagnet design, physics students exploring practical applications of magnetism, and hobbyists engaged in DIY electronics projects may find this discussion relevant.

schuurthing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If I were to build a solenoid for the sake of making an electromagnet with a core shaped like the one below, would it create the desired effect?

CRUDE! :-p Cross-sectional view of my idea.
2vlvc76.jpg


What I'm asking is, would the inner edges of that gap (the sides closest to the center) be one polarity while the outer edge be another? I'm worried that having the iron core continue under the wire would hurt the field...

Ideally one of the two rings in this top view would be "north" and the other "south"...
eb5ye0.jpg


Essentially, would the whole circular piece behave like a horseshoe magnet that is extended to become round?

Thanks for any help and I'll be around the forums more as I traverse my path in physics
(note: while I'm a student, this isn't homework o:) )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I interpret your drawing correctly: Yes, it would.
It should be quite efficient. The field would appear across the gap only and be quite strong.
 
As it stands now, I've found a calculator that optimizes the number of turns for the space given and wire gauge. It then uses that information and your input voltage to come up with the current, power, and it will estimate the "gauss at center". Now this is in the case of a simple electromagnet, not what I've designed above.

Before the part arrives, how could I put the "gauss at center" unit into more understandable terms (like perhaps holding force)?

If my design is as good as I hope, it may get a stronger holding force than the simple electromagnet calculator would indicate, however... I don't have a benchmark for what these numbers mean. I hope I've made myself somewhat clear, and thanks!
 
It sounds like a simple calculator to give the magnetic field (which is measured in gauss) at the centre of a coil of wire,

What you have is completely different. In fact it will probably be stronger by orders of magnitude than the calculator will indicate.

It's possible to calculate these things but there are no simple formulae that I'm aware of for particular shapes and sizes - magnet design is not difficult - but it is complicated.

Calculating the forces from the field strength is also quite complex.

Your best hope is to simply make one and measure the strength. If it isn't strong enough use more turns / more current.
 
AJ Bentley said:
It sounds like a simple calculator to give the magnetic field (which is measured in gauss) at the centre of a coil of wire,

It actually asks for the core size, so it might be a bit closer to what I'm doing, but not really. Thanks!
 
schuurthing;2810330 What I'm asking is said:
135709[/ATTACH]

Essentially, would the whole circular piece behave like a horseshoe magnet that is extended to become round?
eb5ye0.jpg

Yes, I have a circular Alnico magnet just like your rings. For best performance, the cross-sectional areas of the two grey poles should be equal. The inner pole can be solid, not hollow.

Bob S
 

Attachments

  • eb5ye0.jpg
    eb5ye0.jpg
    18.8 KB · Views: 256
Last edited:
Bob S said:
For best performance, the cross-sectional areas of the two grey poles should be equal. The inner pole can be solid, not hollow.

Bob S

But does it NEED to be solid? There has to be that gap, unfortunately.

Edit: By gap, I mean the open space in the center of the magnet.
 
The gap between the inner and outer grey pole should be at least the width of the two poles shown in your diagram. [STRIKE]It may be filled with any non-magnetic material[/STRIKE]. Fill the gap with amp-turns of copper wire. The cross sectional areas (grey areas) of the two poles shown in your diagram should be equal. The inner pole may be hollow, as shown in your diagram.

Bob S
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K