Magnets attract and oppose, right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnertia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception that magnets can serve as standalone power sources for engines without the need for electricity. It clarifies that while magnets can exert forces, they do not generate energy; rather, they convert potential energy to kinetic energy. The concept of perpetual motion is addressed, emphasizing that such machines are impossible due to energy conservation laws. The Physics Forums explicitly bans discussions on perpetual motion machines (PMMs) as they are not scientifically viable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as energy conservation and potential vs. kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with magnetic forces and their applications in technology.
  • Knowledge of the principles behind engines and generators.
  • Awareness of the scientific method and the criteria for testable claims.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the laws of thermodynamics, particularly the first and second laws.
  • Explore the principles of energy conversion in mechanical systems.
  • Study the role of magnets in electrical engineering, focusing on applications in generators and motors.
  • Investigate the reasons behind the scientific community's rejection of perpetual motion machines.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, inventors, and anyone interested in understanding the limitations of magnetic forces in energy generation and the principles of energy conservation.

magnertia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
then why has no one built an engine that requires no wires, no copper. no batteries, capacitors, resistors, no electricity whatsoever? if a magnet is strong enough it can push or pull something, right? then why aren't wheels magnetic? generators, engines, rotors, hard drives...why is electricity necessary if magnetic fields already make things move?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Because magnets are not power sources. You're converting potential energy to kinetic energy and vise versa.

Think of the repelling force of a magnet as a balloon on a stick (because that's really what it acts like). You can push against the balloon and get it to push back, but it's only because of the force you initially put into it.

Think of the attracting force as just gravity. You can climb up onto a chair and jump off and yes gravity will pull you down, but without using energy for your initial effort of climbing onto the chair you wouldn't have been able to get that conversion of gravitational potential energy into kenetic energy moving you downwards.

Now if we put these forces together to try for perpetual motion we get something like you dropping a ball onto a trampoline, sure you will get an oscillation (the bouncing of the ball) for a period of time but eventually it will find equilibrium and movement will come to a stop.
 
Last edited:
magnertia said:
then why has no one built an engine that requires no wires, no copper. no batteries, capacitors, resistors, no electricity whatsoever? if a magnet is strong enough it can push or pull something, right? then why aren't wheels magnetic? generators, engines, rotors, hard drives...why is electricity necessary if magnetic fields already make things move?

Welcome to the PF.

Perpetual motion machines are on the PF "Banned Topics" list, as described in the Rules link at the top of the page. You can read through the linked, locked threads quoted below for more information on why PMMs are not possible.

Rules said:
Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions

Search PF and you will find many threads that have been closed in a number of forums. As for S&D, any claim of this nature would be reproducible and/or testable by the scientific community; hence there is no need for debate.
EDIT by berkeman -- here are some recent locked PMM threads:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=522548
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=520290
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=7735
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=515402
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=403572
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K