Magnets/ Magnetic fields energy storage?

AI Thread Summary
Neodymium magnets generate a powerful force and can be thought of as storing energy when magnetized, but they do not release significant energy over time. The energy density in a magnetic field is calculable, yet the total energy stored in permanent magnets is minimal compared to the energy released from a simple drop. Superconducting magnets can store more energy, but they require extremely low temperatures and have limitations on field changes. Misconceptions exist around magnets as energy sources, particularly among "free energy" advocates, as they do not function like traditional energy storage systems. Overall, while magnetic fields can store energy, practical applications for significant energy storage remain challenging.
Momento
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Very strong magnets like neodymium can create a very powerful force! I wonder the amount of energy supplied when there created to be magnetized, in a sense don't they store energy and it is converted"demagnetized" over time?

It came from the electricity used to create that magnetic field! Its really interesting to me honestly! Magnets are like natural capacitors for me that release a strong force! And discharged "demagnetized" over time! Even supercooled it takes a longer time!

What do you all think?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try calculating the total energy stored in the magnetic field of a permanent magnet and comparing it to, say, the energy released if I drop the magnet on to the floor from a height of 1 meter. I think you'll find that they really don't store very much energy.
 
I do not know of any way to extrqct the energy stored in the magnetic field of permanent magnets like NdFeB.

There have, however, been attempts to store energy in the magnetic field generated by superconducting magnets. Electromagnets need currents flowing. If the conductor has a non-zero resistance, then the stored energy will quickly be converted into heat.

A superconductor has no electrical resistance. On the other hand it needs to be kept cold (very cold) and that is not free. Also, superconductors do not like it if you change the field too quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage

Once you get to a field volume of 1 cubic meter times 8 teslas the amount of stored energy becomes noticable.
 
Momento said:
Very strong magnets like neodymium can create a very powerful force! I wonder the amount of energy supplied when there created to be magnetized, in a sense don't they store energy and it is converted"demagnetized" over time?

Best not think of it like that.

A planet can also create quite a strong force but gravity doesn't "wear out" or become "used up" just because objects fall on it.

Likewise a magnet isn't used up when it's put to work, for example, in a motor.
 
M Quack said:
There have, however, been attempts to store energy in the magnetic field generated by superconducting magnets.
While their primary goal is different: The LHC magnets store up to ~3GJ (~800kWh) during operation, with 11GJ as design value.

Once you get to a field volume of 1 cubic meter times 8 teslas the amount of stored energy becomes noticable.
This is really tricky to achieve.
 
mfb said:
This is really tricky to achieve.

Yes, but not impossibe.

Hybrid magnets (superconducting outsert, resistive inserts) come quite close to this.
The superconducting part provides something like 8-12T with a warm bore of 60cm or more.

http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/usershub/scientificdivisions/dcfield/hybrid/index.html
 
The problem is that a lot of people (especially so called "free energy" believers) think that magnets are an energy source/store and that this somehow explains how fridge magnets stay up. That's totally wrong.
 
  • #10
A good nuclear power station puts out over a GW. So even if you store 11 GJ in huge magnets like at LHC that can only replace a single nuclear plant for a few seconds.
 
  • #11
Inductors store energy in a magnetic field when current is passed through them. The stored energy increases with current squared. They aren't very practical for energy storage, because energy lost to internal resistance also increases with current squared, so any stored energy is quickly lost, unless you are using some kind of superconducting coils, like the EAST tokamak.
 
Back
Top