Magnitude and Phase of Transfer Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transfer function H(s) = 10/(s(s^2 + 80s + 400)), specifically focusing on deriving its magnitude and phase components for the purpose of plotting Bode plots. Participants are examining both the mathematical manipulation of the transfer function and the interpretation of phase angles.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their phase calculation, noting a discrepancy with their textbook's phase expression.
  • Another participant suggests that the phase of the denominator is the negative of the transfer function's phase, providing a mathematical breakdown of the denominator's components.
  • A third participant clarifies that the phase angle should be calculated as the negative of the arctangent of the imaginary part over the real part of the denominator.
  • There is a discussion about the correct interpretation of phase angles, particularly the distinction between negative angles and angles shifted by 180 degrees.
  • Participants acknowledge errors in their previous statements regarding phase angle calculations and express a sense of confusion about the subtleties involved in electrical engineering concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the method for calculating the phase angle but also demonstrate disagreement regarding the correctness of the textbook's phase expression and the interpretation of phase shifts. The discussion remains unresolved as participants continue to clarify their understanding.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the calculations, particularly concerning the signs of the components in the arctangent expressions and the implications of phase shifts in electrical engineering.

zonedestruct
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am given the transfer function H(s) = 10/(s(s^2 + 80s +400)) where s = jω [j is the imaginary unit i] and I am trying to get it into its magnitude and phase components.

The Attempt at a Solution



I rearranged it to 1/(40jω(1+ 4jω/20 + (jω/20)^2)) which is the standard form for transfer functions. I am wanting to plot the bode plots so I took the 20 * log base 10 of the entire transfer function and got for the magnitude: -20log(40) - 20log(1/(jω))- 20log(1+ 4jω/20 + (jω/20)^2)
and for the phase I got: -90° - tan^-1((ω/5)/(1-ω^2/400))

but in my textbook when they show the bode plots for the phase it has - tan^-1(ω/(1-ω^2/400)) for one of the phase factors and I am not sure why my numerator is ω/5 and there one is just ω.

If you don't study electrical engineering and are not sure of some of the stuff I said then basically H(s) = 10/(s(s^2 + 80s +400)) where s = jω is a complex number and j is the same as the imaginary unit i, so I need help to put this complex number into its magnitude and phase, I am pretty sure i got the magnitude part right.

Please can anyone help me by at least showing me how to get the phase part of this complex number
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the numerator of your transfer function is purely real we can concentrate on the denominator; it's phase will be the negative of (180° shifted) the transfer function's phase.

## s ( s^2 + 80 s + 400 ) → \omega j (-\omega^2 + 80 j \omega + 400) ##

## -80 \omega^2 + j (400 \omega - \omega^3) ##

Divide through by 400ω:

## -\frac{\omega}{5} + j \left( 1 - \frac{\omega^2}{400} \right) ##

Looks like the book's solution is not correct.
 
The phase part is just tan-1{(imaginary part)/(real part)}.

As gneill pointed out, your transfer function phase angle will be the negative of the numerator phase angle, i.e.

ψ = - tan-1{(imaginary part)/(real part)} of the denominator.

{However, -ψ is not the same as ψ shifted by 180. E.g if ψ = 30 deg, -ψ is the same as 360 - 30 = 330 deg, not 30 - 180 or 30 + 180.}

Also, be careful to preserve numerator and denominator signs in the arc tan expression. So arc tan(-a/b) is not the same angle as arc tan(a/-b).
 
rude man said:
{However, -ψ is not the same as ψ shifted by 180. E.g if ψ = 30 deg, -ψ is the same as 360 - 30 = 330 deg, not 30 - 180 or 30 + 180.}
Good catch, rude man; That was a brain fart on my part :redface: I hate when that happens :smile:
 
gneill said:
Good catch, rude man; That was a brain fart on my part :redface: I hate when that happens :smile:

Don't feel bad! After writing that I wasn't so sure myself that what I wrote was really right! It's really something to think about - after all -V does = V at 180! Subtle business, electricity!

No to mention that what I wrote wasn't quite right anyway - the angle of the transfer function, not that of the numerator, is the negative of the angle of the denominator, as you of course had already pointed out. Oy vey!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K