What is the Magnitude of Acceleration in a Frictionless Equation?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the magnitude of the girl's acceleration while pulling the boy on a frictionless surface, the correct approach involves using Newton's second law, F=ma. The girl exerts a force of 4.50N on the boy, but the acceleration must be calculated using her mass, which is 30.3kg. The confusion arose from initially using the boy's mass instead of the girl's. After correcting this mistake, the proper calculation yields the girl's acceleration. Understanding the application of F=ma is crucial in solving such physics problems.
shimizua
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 30.3kg girl and a 56.0kg boy are on the surface of a frozen lake, 15.0m apart. Using a rope, the girl exerts a horizontal 4.50N force on the boy, pulling him toward her. Calculate the magnitude of the girl's acceleration.

so for this problem i am just confused about the equation to use. i know that it will use a frictionless equation but that is about all that i am sure of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh, and i had tried F=ma but that was wrong
 
OK. So, you tried F=ma. That is the equation you should use. I'll need to see your work to help you find your mistake.
 
i figured it out, i was using the guys m and that was the problem
 
OK cool! Good job.
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Similar threads

Initial acceleration problem: Two children on a frictionless floor
Replies
7
Views
4K
Distance from an initial position that two objects will meet
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Does Nick's Acceleration Change When His Friend Pulls the Rope?
Replies
6
Views
4K
Why is the girl and the sled accelerating in opposite directions?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Is My Understanding of Accelerations in Irodov 1.258 Correct?
Replies
14
Views
1K
What is the magnitude of the acceleration of cylinder's com?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Intuition on the direction of friction in a rotational dynamics problem
Replies
13
Views
2K
Magnitude of acceleration of boxes -- is this method correct?
Replies
7
Views
3K
How Does Newton's Third Law Apply Here?
Replies
2
Views
3K
How to solve for the moment of inertia and angular acceleration?
Replies
21
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top