Maintaining constant air pressure in leaky container

AI Thread Summary
To maintain 50 psi in a 30,000 cft cylinder with a 50 ft long and 1/8 inch wide leak, calculating the necessary air-supply flow involves using Bernoulli's equation to determine airflow through the gap. The airflow calculated should then be divided by 2 to account for a 50% nozzle efficiency, resulting in a significantly high air volume requirement. The formula q=f(p,V,L,w) can be applied to derive the necessary compressor capacity based on the given parameters. The discussion emphasizes the challenge of maintaining pressure due to the leak's size and the substantial airflow needed. Ultimately, achieving constant air pressure in such a scenario requires careful consideration of these calculations.
airpressure
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How can I calculate the air-supply flow (q=cfm) needed to maintain, say, p=50 psi of pressure in a (quasi-rigid) cylinder with a Volume of V=30,000 cft, when this cylinder has an open gap (leak) 50 ft long (L=50 ft) and 1/8 inch wide (w=1/8 inch)?

Is there a simple formula I can use to compute the necessary capacity of an air compressor (needed for supplying the air flow) as a function of the parameters given above
[q=f(p,V,L,w)] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Bernoulli's equation to figure out the airflow through the gap with 50 psi of backpressure. Then divide by 2 to figure in a 50% nozzle efficiency. You'll find it to be an enormous amount of air.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top