Understanding Charge and Current in a Series of Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two questions related to charge and current. In the first question, participants analyze the charge distribution among three metal spheres after they touch and separate, emphasizing that charges equalize and must be recalculated based on the new distribution. The second question involves calculating the time it takes for a specific number of electrons to pass through a wire carrying a current of 80 mA, with a focus on correctly solving for the time variable. Participants clarify that charge conservation is key in both scenarios, and the importance of equilibrium in charge distribution is highlighted. Overall, the discussion aims to resolve misunderstandings in the application of these concepts.
Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
Ok I got two questions dealing with Charge and Current.

1) Consider three identical metal spheres . Initally , sphere A contains a charge of 2uC and B contains a charge of 10uC. Sphere C has a charge of -4uC. Spheres A and B touch each other, and then are seperated. Then Sphere B and C touch and then seperate. What is the charge on C now.

I had gusses positive and he marked .5 off soo i assume i need a number with that. Not sure what to do with it.

2)If a metal wires carries a current of 80.mA, how long does it take for the 3.00 x10^20 electrons to pass a given corss-sectional area of the wire.

I had use I= deltaQ/delta t and had gotten 2 seconds. his resposne was "correct, but now solve for delta t... i throught i just sloved for it.



Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Spectre32
1) ...
I had gusses positive and he marked .5 off soo i assume i need a number with that. Not sure what to do with it.
It's just an accounting problem. You have to make the assumption (I'm assuming) that the contact between the spheres lasts long enough for the charge to reach equilibrium. Do it in two steps.




Originally posted by Spectre32
2) ...
his resposne was "correct, but now solve for delta t... i throught i just sloved for it.
Ya, I agree with you. I can't imagine what he was thinking about. (I did not check to see if 2 s is correct.)
 
Last edited:
Alirhgt awosome, also so what you were saying in my first question. THe charges equalize and then you take that charge and add it to the negative one... correct.
 
Originally posted by Spectre32
THe charges equalize and then you take that charge and add it to the negative one... correct.
"that charge?" I don't know to what you are referring. A and B join together to share all of their charge. Since they are identical metal spheres (and since we are making previously said assumption), they will share the charge half and half. But don't forget that they separate, after which, you will have a new distribution of charge among the three spheres (not 2, 10, -4 any more). Then, according to this new distribution, you do step 2.

One way to check to see if you made a mistake is to add all the charges and see if it is the same as what you would get if you add all the charges in the original distribution. You can use this to check each step, because charge is conserved.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top