Making a Wooden Airplane: Will Airfoils Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eaboujaoudeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane
AI Thread Summary
Using airfoils instead of flat wings may not significantly impact performance at low speeds for small wooden airplanes, especially if the model is under 20 inches in length. Factors like angle of attack and total wing area are more critical for flight performance. Adding dihedral to the wings can enhance stability, while camber can improve lift even with flat balsa sheets. The project faced challenges due to a large, vibrating electrical motor, which affected overall performance. Adjusting the wing design and incorporating camber could lead to better results in future iterations.
eaboujaoudeh
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
During unviversity we had a project to make a piece a wooden airplane driven by an electrical motor, it was a difficult but lovely experience, in such a limited time and resources that we were bounded with. My question is that would u think that using airfoils instead of flat wings would create a huge difference at low speeds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't mention what scale this was on, or what sort of motor was involved, so I'm going to assume that it was a balsa construction of less than 20" in length with maybe a 24" wingspan. If that's the case, I don't believe that an airfoil shape would make much difference. Your angle of attack and total wing area would probably be the deciding factors for performance. Best let Fred, Russ, Rainman Aero, Andre and the other experts weigh in before taking my word for it.
 
My own experience dictates that there should be plenty of dihedral on the wings to enhance stability.
 
If you are just using flat balsa sheets, camber actually does make quite a bit of difference.
 
yes balsa wood and definitely smaller than 24'' by a large bit, but i think i should enlarge wings. and the downside of the whole project was that the teacher challenged us with a large electrical engine with a lot of vibrations, i perfected the prop till the vibrations became very small in size, but still have an effect. so i guess i'll make the camber...thnx guys
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top