Many Particle in a one dimensional box

dev70
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi pf,

I am just wondering how would the system be if i keep say 5 particles in a 1-D box. How would the wave functions be? Will quantum superposition happen? Entanglement? What about the energy levels? How would they be quantized? In short i want to know how would you solve the Schrodinger's Equation in a many particle 1-D box?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're crossing into the regime of statistical mechanics.

Are the particles distinguishable?
Do they interact? How?
How big is the box?
etc.
 
What if we consider two cases in which particles are identical and other in which they are not (distinguishable )? And as far as the box is considered, we may take any length say 'a' but in one dimension only.
 
dev70 said:
What if we consider two cases in which particles are identical and other in which they are not (distinguishable )? And as far as the box is considered, we may take any length say 'a' but in one dimension only.

Elementary particles are treated as indistinguishable in quantum mechanics, provided that they are of the same type.

Did you follow the link that I posted? It explains the problem well.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
143
Views
11K
Back
Top