Maple TA - What is this asking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter likearollings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster seeks clarification on a differentiation problem related to partial derivatives, specifically involving notation in a Maple TA context. The assignment focuses on the review of differentiation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate with respect to y while keeping other variables constant but encounters difficulties. Questions arise regarding the meaning of the notation f subscript zx and the correct approach to differentiation.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the nature of partial derivatives, with a few clarifying the notation and suggesting the need to differentiate first with respect to x and then z. There is an acknowledgment of potential confusion regarding the notation used for partial derivatives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects uncertainty about the notation and its implications for the differentiation process, as well as the possibility of errors in the original poster's approach. There is no explicit consensus on the resolution of the problem.

likearollings
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/5496/16943970.jpg

Could anybody here tell me what this question is asking?

I have tried differentiating with respect to y and keeping x and z constant but i got the asnwer wrong. The topic of this assignment is 'review of differentiaion' so I am assuming its something to do with differentiation.

If anybody is familiar with maple TA, is it a glitch or something?

What does f subscript zx mean?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
dont be affraid to answer
 
Partial derivative
 
Thank you SO MUCH for the overwhelming response, I managed to filter through all the replies and found a lot of correct answer telling me that i had to:

differentiate with respect to x and then again with z.

again thank you so much
 
likearollings said:
Thank you SO MUCH for the overwhelming response, I managed to filter through all the replies and found a lot of correct answer telling me that i had to:

differentiate with respect to x and then again with z.

again thank you so much

Actually, fzx means differentiate first with respect to z, then respect to x. Of course, the answers are the same if you have continuity of the second partials. Using the other notation you have

f_{zx} = \frac {\partial^2}{\partial x \partial z}f

so, unfortunately, the two notations are reversed from each other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
25K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 147 ·
5
Replies
147
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K