- #71
mheslep
Gold Member
- 364
- 729
A march for something like Less Bias in Science might have been worthwhile, instead celebrity led the way:
mheslep said:A march for something like Less Bias in Science might have been worthwhile, instead celebrity led the way:
Perhaps it is for some, for others it's entertainment or some other nonsense.strangerep said:which totally misses the point that science is not an alternative religion.
Sure miss lisab ?OmCheeto said:Wow...
Way over my head...
But going through the thread, I noticed one name, of a mutual PF/FB friend, who was the only person who posted a picture of her sign at the march:
Smart lady.
Moonbear.RonL said:Sure miss lisab ?
Astronuc said:The problem is often not the science, but rather how it is communicated or miscommunicated to the public.
strangerep said:science is not an alternative religion
BillTre said:There's nothing wrong with celebrity in of itself.
Its what celebrities might do that could be troubling.
Is there some unstated problem with Bill Nye?
By the way, I think that's one of the better pictures I've seen of him.
Thanks!
My interpretation would be a little different in a detail.OmCheeto said:Of the 68 people engaged in the debate, 26 people were "pro policy" and only 8 were "con policy". And yet the general public has voted down the "pro policy" initiative every single time it has come up. The point being: Scientists have not convinced the people of my city that there is any validity to their conclusion.
This is probably the article John Oliver referred to on 538.OmCheeto said:Thank you John Oliver, for that "p-hacking" term.
I would agree, but it's been 61 years, and there have been 4 votes: 1956, 1962, 1980, 2013BillTre said:My interpretation would be a little different in a detail.
the result of an election reflects not only the ability to convince people among a population, but also how many of those people actually go out and vote in the issue (often called turn-out or motivation).
This is probably the article John Oliver referred to on 538.
collinsmark said:...That's a big deal. It's terrifying.
There are http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm.mheslep said:I think the finding by Ioannidis, across many fields of study, is the big deal:
"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"
mheslep said:NdGT: Cult of Science