Marginal PDF Bounds: Calculating Integration Limits

fishies
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

So I'm having trouble telling what the integration bounds should be when calculation the marginal PDF of two random variables.

So the joint PDF fX1,X2(x1,x2) is a constant C = 1 in the regions x1 and x2.
The regions are bound by 0<=x1<=1 and 0<=x2<=2(1-x1).

If the marginal PDFs are defined as:
fx1 = int(-inf,inf) fX1,X2(x1,x2)*dx2
fx2 = int(-inf,inf) fX1,X2(x1,x2)*dx1

what will the integration bounds be?

Thanks for your help,
Fishies
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fishies said:
what will the integration bounds be?

Fishies

They will be the same as the bounds that you stated for x1 and x2. Is that what you're asking? The use of minus infinity to plus infinity in theorems involving the distribution of random variables is correct if we use the convention that the distributions are defined to be zero at places where they are otherwise "undefined". To actually perform the integrations on distributions given by algebraic expressions but restricted to finite areas, you must use bounds that restrict the integration to those areas.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top