Mark Whittaker says the dark matter cant cool

AI Thread Summary
Mark Whittaker asserts that dark matter cannot cool like atomic matter due to its lack of electromagnetic interactions, which are essential for thermal equilibrium. This inability to cool is linked to dark matter's negligible scattering cross section with normal matter, making it difficult to detect. The discussion highlights that while normal matter achieves thermal equilibrium through collisions and radiation exchange, dark matter's interactions are fundamentally different. Consequently, this leads to the formation of persistent galactic halos. The conclusion drawn is that the properties of dark matter are intrinsic to its nature and not yet fully understood or measured.
BkBkBk
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm just watching a lecture series with Mark Whittaker in and he states (while talking about primordial roughness and sachs-wolfe effect) "the property that atomic matter has dark matter does not, is that it can cool" but he leaves it at that and provides no further clarification,and I am struggling to find anything in my searches. If it is true, how has he come to this conclusion, is it intrinsic to the candidates for dark matter,or something we have a good theoretical underpinning for? Surely its not something we have actually measured,since we are yet to find dark matter, could somebody please clarify?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All stable nuclear and atomic particles have a large Coulomb or atomic scattering cross sections for transferring momentum and energy from one particle to another. We are unable to detect weakly-interacting dark matter, in part because its scattering cross section with normal matter is negligibly small. This probably is also true for the dark-dark scattering cross section, leading to the predicted persistent galactic halos.

Bob S
 
Normal matter comes to thermal equilibrium through collisions and exchange of radiation, both of which happen mostly through the electromagnetic force.
Dark matter does not interact through the electromagnetic force, so the usual way of achieving thermal equilibrium is gone.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top