B Mars' Global Sandstorm: Causes and Effects

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Singlau
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dust Mars storms
AI Thread Summary
Mars experiences global sandstorms primarily during perihelion when the southern hemisphere is more heated, leading to significant sublimation of CO2 from the southern polar cap. This heating causes increased air movement from the southern hemisphere to the northern hemisphere. At aphelion, the southern hemisphere cools, resulting in CO2 deposition rather than sublimation, which does not generate the same wind dynamics. The axial tilt of Mars and its highly eccentric orbit contribute to the differences in solar radiation received, affecting temperature and atmospheric conditions. Consequently, global dust storms are less frequent at aphelion due to slower processes of deposition compared to sublimation.
Singlau
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Recently I read a book about Mars, and it says that global sandstorm blows from southern hemisphere to northern hemisphere at perihelion. It's because the southern part is more heated at that position and the closer distance to sun gives it a high temperature, thus sublimating large amount CO2 in the southern polar cap. This increase in amount of air blows from southern hemisphere.

Here is my question: why doesn't sandstorm blow in another way at aphelion?

When Mars is farther from sun, its southern hemisphere is farther than northern one, so less heated. More CO2 is deposited back to the southern polar caps. At the sane time, northern ice cap absorb less air back relatively. Why doesn't this difference around the globe create global sandstorm as well?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mars (as every orbiting body) spends more time closer to aphelion, and overall temperatures are lower, so I would expect the processes to be slower there.

Mars doesn't have a global duststorm every orbit, so it could also be some combination of multiple conditions that have to come together.
 
  • Like
Likes Singlau
Thanks!
 
Singlau said:
Recently I read a book about Mars, and it says that global sandstorm blows from southern hemisphere to northern hemisphere at perihelion. It's because the southern part is more heated at that position and the closer distance to sun gives it a high temperature, thus sublimating large amount CO2 in the southern polar cap. This increase in amount of air blows from southern hemisphere.

Here is my question: why doesn't sandstorm blow in another way at aphelion?

When Mars is farther from sun, its southern hemisphere is farther than northern one, so less heated. More CO2 is deposited back to the southern polar caps. At the sane time, northern ice cap absorb less air back relatively. Why doesn't this difference around the globe create global sandstorm as well?

There are two effects in play here. there is the axial tilt and the distance towards from the Sun. When Mars is at perihelion, its South pole is pointing more towards the Sun and gets warmer (just like Summers in the Northern hemisphere on Earth are warmer because the North pole is pointing more towards the Sun). It has nothing to to with the Southern hemisphere being closer to the Sun than the northern one, it is the fact that the Sun's rays strike the surface more vertically and the day lit hours are longer. Now add in the fact that Mar's orbit has an eccentricity of over 4 times that of the Earth, so there is a greater difference in Solar radiation at perihelion and you have a lot more heating at this time. At aphelion, the Northern hemisphere is no pointed towards the Sun and has the longer daylight hours, but now Mars is further away from the Sun, so you are not going to get as much heating of the Northern hemisphere during its summer that the Southern one got during its Summer. ( the solar radiation difference varies by ~46%)
 
  • Like
Likes Singlau
Yes, I know that northern hemisphere is not heated that much. But what I'm saying in the first post is that wind is caused by a rapid decrease of air in southern hemisphere, instead of rapid increase of northern ice.

Anyway, now I do understand that the effect on deposition is slower or somehow less rapid than sublimation, which only cause dust storms at perihelion.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
184
Views
47K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top