Mass and Energy Conservation in Relativistic Frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter ankitpandey
  • Start date Start date
ankitpandey
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
watching from Earth frame, i see an electron lose a photon and get slower. but if i consider a frame still moving with initial velocity of electron, what do i see? the electron looses a photon,but moves faster. hence its relativistic mass is also greater than rest mass.total energy has increased in both ways. how is sum of mass and energy conserved here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bravo, you have just shown a single free electron cannot emit a single photon.
 
What if it is not free but oscillating due to an alternating electrical field? Does it still see itself in freefall, emitting photons for no reason? or does it "feel" itself accelerating since the field is not gravitational?
 
A stationary accelerometer in the oscillating electron's rest frame would register an oscillating acceleration, so you know that the frame is non-inertial and therefore the electron would "feel" itself accelerating.

To the OP: you may want to look into the conservation of four-momentum, which encapsulates the conservation of energy and conservation of momentum in one nice convenient Lorentz-invariant package.
 
well then let us assume electron and neutron moving in direction of electric field.then, with respect to nuetron, is electron gaining energy when it is actually becoming slower relative to earth?
 
What does conservation of the four-momentum tell you?
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top