Mass Defect to calculate the stability of a nucleus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of mass defect and binding energy in nuclear physics, particularly in the formation of fluorine-19. It clarifies that binding energy is the energy released when a nucleus is formed, despite the mass defect being negative. The energy released to the surroundings during nuclear formation is a result of the conversion of mass into energy, which is consistent with the principles of nuclear binding. The analogy of magnets is used to illustrate that the energy released is not additional but rather a manifestation of the binding process. Overall, the binding energy is essential for understanding the stability of nuclei and the energy dynamics involved in their formation.
4everphysics
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This is just a simple conceptual question.

When we try to calculate a nuclear binding energy of some nucleus,
we get the mass defect(del M) and find the binding energy by using
(del M)c^2 right?

Well, what I do not understand is this.
For instance, let's take a formation of a flourine-19.
Flourine formation(out of neutrons and protons) would be exothermic because del M is negative, but why would energy be released to the surrounding if also the same amount of energy is being used to bind the nucleus together?

Meaning, if some (x)J amount of energy is being used as a binding energy of flourine, the mass would convert to that energy and will be thus used to bind the flourine nucleus (and if that energy is being hold onto by the nucleus as a binding energy, it should not be released to the surrounding. no?)

I hope I have phrased my question right.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Binding energy is energy required to break something apart, not to put something together. I know it sounds backwards, but it is consistent with classical picture of holding things together. If there is a force pulling two objects together, you must do work to pull them apart. Conversely, you can make them do work by letting them pull together closer. So the binding energy is released when the nucleus is formed, not absorbed.
 
So if the nucleus forms a "rope" when it is formed by converting the mass to the "rope",
why is seemingly "additional" energy released to the environment as well? when it is used up by forming the "rope"?
 
That's just not how it works. Picture two powerful magnets sticking to each other. The sound they make as they smash into each other is basically the release of the binding energy. There is nothing there that requires additional energy.
 
Magnets that snap together have opposite charge. Maybe the binding energy is the energy required to hold together like charged nucleons...
 
Look at it this way. The mass defect in a hydrogen atom is -13.6 eV, relative to a free proton and electron.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top