Mass Equation in SR: Determining Rest Mass of Moving Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arsenic&Lace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Arsenic&Lace
Messages
533
Reaction score
37
Here's my stupid question: In the mass equation from SR, we have the m0 term for rest mass; but how would you determine the rest mass of an object? Isn't an object on the earth, which is in motion, also in motion? So wouldn't the mass of an object on Earth not actually be its mass at rest?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arsenic&Lace said:
Here's my stupid question: In the mass equation from SR, we have the m0 term for rest mass; but how would you determine the rest mass of an object? Isn't an object on the earth, which is in motion, also in motion? So wouldn't the mass of an object on Earth not actually be its mass at rest?

Thanks in advance!

All you need to measure rest mass directly is to not be in motion relative to the object you are measuring. It doesn't matter at all that you and the object are moving relative to something else (e.g. the sun).

Further, if you are measuring an object moving relative to you, there is a simple formula for deriving its rest mass from its total energy and momentum (E^2 - (pc)^2)/c^2 . Alternatively, if you measure its speed and momentum, you can calculate its rest mass.
 
PAllen said:
All you need to measure rest mass directly is to not be in motion relative to the object you are measuring. It doesn't matter at all that you and the object are moving relative to something else (e.g. the sun).

Thanks! If you don't mind, another question: why is this the case?
 
Arsenic&Lace said:
Thanks! If you don't mind, another question: why is this the case?

Well, the whole point of relativity is there is no way to know 'who is at rest', so a definition of rest mass that could never be computed would be pretty useless.

So it's just a definition: rest mass = mass measured by an observer for whom the body is at rest. Shorthand: mass measured in the body's own frame of reference.
 
Last edited:
Aah okay, thanks a bunch!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top