Mass Loss in Batteries: Debunking a Myth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the misconception that a battery's mass decreases significantly as it discharges due to energy conversion, referencing E=mc². Participants clarify that while E=mc² applies to all reactions, including chemical ones, the mass loss during battery discharge is negligible and primarily due to vented gases. They emphasize that the mass change is too small to be measured with standard equipment, contrasting it with nuclear reactions where significant mass is converted to energy. The conversation also touches on concepts like binding energy and mass deficit, noting that traditional conservation of mass is a useful assumption in chemistry, albeit not strictly accurate. Ultimately, the mass loss in chemical reactions, including battery discharge, is minimal and not practically consequential.
Eugbug
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I just want to confirm an error I have seen on another website about discharging of batteries.
The poster suggested that the mass of a battery decreases because matter is being converted into energy according to the equation E=mc2 as the battery discharges. They said that because c is so large, the weight loss would be imperceptible.My understanding is that any loss in weight is due to vented gases from the chemical reaction and E=mc2 only applies to nuclear reactions and not chemical reactions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope, E=MC^2 applies to all reactions. Consider a simply molecule such as water. Take the two hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom and determine their mass before they combine. Now, combine them into a water molecule and measure the molecules mass. It will have LESS mass than the combined mass of the free hydrgoen and oxygen atoms. The missing mass was released in the energy that the reaction gives off.
 
Drakkith said:
Nope, E=MC^2 applies to all reactions. Consider a simply molecule such as water. Take the two hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom and determine their mass before they combine. Now, combine them into a water molecule and measure the molecules mass. It will have LESS mass than the combined mass of the free hydrgoen and oxygen atoms. The missing mass was released in the energy that the reaction gives off.

The mass change is tiny and unmeasurable on a standard chemistry balance. You can use E=mc^2 and apply it to the energy released in the reaction and you'll come up with a miniscule change in mass.
 
The nuclear bomb that deverstated Hiroshima converted about 1 gm of matter into energy.
 
Check out BINDING ENERGY and MASS DEFICIT for some insights on the above posts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_energy#Mass_deficit


You'll note that it is "binding energy mass" is what changes rather than traditional "mass".

As an example, if you heat a substance it will have more "mass" and more gravitational effect
than before heating...The kinetic energy after heating of the constitutent particles increases and contributes to rest "mass" as noted above via E = mc2...

In a nuclear reaction, some actual constitutent particles are destroyed and converted to energy...radiation...again via E = mc2
 
Chemists usually assume conservation of mass from reactants they combine to the chemical products they form. It's a useful assumption in many applications where the energy release is below nuclear levels. It's not strictly true however. The heat energy that is released does correspond to a very small loss of mass, usually of an amount of no practical consequence, that is, if the reaction doesn't go nuclear.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top