Mass moment inertia of object displaced from axiz

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mass moment of inertia for an object displaced from its axis of rotation. Two primary methods are presented: developing an integral for mass distribution around the axis or applying the parallel axis theorem. The consensus leans towards using the integral method due to its simplicity when the object is oriented away from the axis. Participants agree that computing the integral over the specified interval is a straightforward approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass moment of inertia
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of mass moment of inertia using integrals
  • Explore applications of the parallel axis theorem in various contexts
  • Learn about rotational dynamics and its implications in engineering
  • Investigate examples of mass distribution in different geometric shapes
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mechanical engineering, and applied mathematics who are involved in projects requiring the calculation of mass moment of inertia and understanding rotational dynamics.

PTC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey y'all,

A plea for general advice here as I embark on a project. Say I have an object rotating around an axis but *displaced* some distance "r" from that axis. It's length, a dimension perpendicular to the axis, is "a." I'm interested in finding the mass moment of inertia for the object. As I see it, I have two choices: (1) develop an integral describing the mass distribution of the object around the axis and then use the fundamental theorem and the interval r to r+a or; (2) use the parallel axis theorem, that is, develop definitive integrals describing both the mass distribution of the object at r=0 and around the axis at r->r+a, summing the two. So real simply, fundamental theorem or parallel axis theorem?

Thanks!

PTC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I never really got my head round the parallel axis theorem, so I would use 1), which should be fairly easy, since the object is pointing straight away from the axis, it makes the integral fairly simple.
 
Thanks, Bruce! That's just about what I figured--it'd be much easier to compute over the interval. Thanks again!

PTC
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K