Mass on wedge on incline problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex physics problem involving two masses on inclines with different angles. The user expresses difficulty in applying their knowledge of frictionless problems to this advanced scenario. A suggestion is made to utilize separate frames of reference for each mass to simplify the calculations. By determining the total acceleration of the system and considering the inertial effects on the second mass, the user can find the necessary forces. This approach aims to clarify the relationship between the two masses and their respective motions.
uhohitzluke
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is provided in the pdf attachment

Homework Equations



I know how to solve frictionless problems with a single mass on an incline but this is just too advanced for me. (especially with two inclines of different angles)

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew free body diagrams of A and B separately. I'm not sure how I'm supposed to find the summation of forces in the x and y directions when both inclines have different angles. I'm totally lost and I have to turn this in tomorrow ):
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there, welcome to the forum.
Whenever there's a question concerning multiple masses, especially those featuring some stacked on one another & requiring simultaneous computation of acceleration/relative velocities, that sort of thing, it always helps to distinguish, whenever possible between convenient frames of reference; By that I mean:
Firstly, using the angle of the larger wedge(A in your case), find the total acceleration of the system, which has a cumulative mass of A+B(and you can assume, for the initial duration of the motion, that they'll safely travel together). This will generate, however, an inertial acceleration seperately on the mass B, acting oppositely on it, which you would then incorporate to find out its acceleration solely(using its angle, B's). Relative velocity, as you recall is determined by:
<br /> \large<br /> V_{b,a} = V_b-V_a<br />
And the query is readily resolved.
I hope that clears matters somewhat,
Daniel
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top