Mass spectrum-need 3 peak designations

  • Thread starter Thread starter FlipStyle1308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Peak
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying three m/z peaks at 95, 109, and 123 in a mass spectrum for a homework assignment. The poster has already identified other peaks and notes that the spectrum resembles a textbook example of bicyclo[n.o.t.]forbiddenene. They mention encountering similar structures online, specifically message[4.0.4]failurene. Assistance is requested to determine the identities of the three uncertain peaks. The inquiry highlights the challenge of peak identification in mass spectrometry.
FlipStyle1308
Messages
264
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am assigning m/z peaks on a mass spectrum, and there are 3 peaks not on the chart given by the instructor, and I was wondering if anyone can help me determined their identities. The peaks I am unsure of are found at 95 m/z, 109 m/z, and 123 m/z; I already figured out the rest of them. Thanks!

Homework Equations


N/A.

The Attempt at a Solution


I already determined the 4 peaks on the left and the 2 on the right, and just need help with the peaks at 95 m/z, 109 m/z, and 123 m/z.

Spectrum found at:
IMG.cgi?fname=MSNW8935&imgdir=msW.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like the textbook example of bicyclo[n.o.t.]forbiddenene.
I've seen this and a closely related structure, message[4.0.4]failurene, many times in my travels on the internet...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top