Masses over a Pulley (w/ angular kinematics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a pulley and angular kinematics. The original poster calculated the net torque and inertia but expressed uncertainty about their accuracy and the overall solution. Respondents emphasized the importance of clearly presenting work in text format rather than images to facilitate better assistance. They suggested reconsidering the approach, particularly by applying the conservation of energy principle, which was overlooked in the initial attempt. The conversation highlights the need for clarity and methodical reasoning in tackling physics problems.
Cdh0127
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/koz4PpI
koz4PpI.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to calculate the net torque on the pulley as 55.88 and the Inertia as .352. Those could be wrong, but that's as far as I could get. I really have no idea. Any kind of help/explanation would be wonderful!
uKqQHtJ.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cdh0127. Welcome to Physics Forums!

Please show details of what you've tried. Show us the formulas you've used and how you've applied them. It's hard to help you when we can't see what you're working with and what you've tried. Wrong answers don't tell us how they may have gone wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Cdh0127
gneill said:
Hi Cdh0127. Welcome to Physics Forums!

Please show details of what you've tried. Show us the formulas you've used and how you've applied them. It's hard to help you when we can't see what you're working with and what you've tried. Wrong answers don't tell us how they may have gone wrong.

I just added a screenshot of my work. I hope you can make sense of it xD
 
Cdh0127 said:
I just added a screenshot of my work. I hope you can make sense of it xD
You'd be better off laying out your work in text in a post, explaining the steps. That way helpers can quote the lines and point out issues. Otherwise you're expecting them to forensically untangle where you started and what you did from the scatter of notes on the image. You're really limiting the number of helpers who'll be willing to make the effort that way.
 
Just to add my 2 cents from a quick perusal of your diagram, it doesn't appear that you went anywhere with the conservation of energy approach suggested in the problem statement. You went after torques and forces instead.

Rethink your approach. Where does the energy come from to make the system move? How much energy is made available from the initial position to the final position? Where does it go?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top