Massless Particles and the algebra involved

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay of a positive pion into a muon and a neutrino, focusing on the application of conservation of energy and momentum principles. The problem involves calculating the speed of the muon given the rest masses of the particles involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various algebraic manipulations and approaches to relate the momenta and energies of the particles. There are attempts to simplify the equations and concerns about potential errors in the algebraic process. Some participants suggest using different methods, such as the four-momentum approach, while others express uncertainty about their current path.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing different perspectives and methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding algebraic simplifications and alternative approaches, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes a lack of familiarity with the four-momentum concept, which may limit their ability to follow certain suggestions. Additionally, there are concerns about the complexity of the algebra involved and potential mistakes due to fatigue.

forrealfyziks
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The positive pion decays into a muon and a neutrino. The pion has rest mass m=140 MeV/c^2, the muon has m=106 MeV/c^2 while the neutrino is about m=0 (assume it is). Assuming the original pion was at rest, use conservation of energy and momentum to show that the speed of the muon is given by

U/c = [(m[tex]\pi[/tex]/m[tex]\mu[/tex])2 - 1] / [(m[tex]\pi[/tex]/m[tex]\mu[/tex])2 + 1]


Homework Equations


For massless particles, E=pc u=c [tex]\beta[/tex]=1
p=[tex]\gamma[/tex]mu E=[tex]\gamma[/tex]mc2


The Attempt at a Solution

(Note [tex]\gamma[/tex] and u are for mu, since it's the only particle using them)
Alright, I know that P[tex]\pi[/tex]=0 and P[tex]\mu[/tex]+P[tex]\nu[/tex]=0. I found that P[tex]\nu[/tex]=-[tex]\gamma[/tex]m[tex]\mu[/tex]u[tex]\mu[/tex]
I replace p in m[tex]\pi[/tex]c2=P[tex]\nu[/tex]c + [tex]\gamma[/tex]m[tex]\mu[/tex]c2 and reduced it down and got
m[tex]\pi[/tex]c=[tex]\gamma[/tex]m[tex]\mu[/tex](c-u)
I then unraveled the gamma, moved some stuff around, and squared both sides and got (m[tex]\pi[/tex]/m[tex]\mu[/tex])2=(c-v)2/(1-v2/c2)
I don't know if this is the right path, but I have tried many different methods from this point and nothing seems to get any closer to what I need. Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
forrealfyziks said:
m[tex]\pi[/tex]c=[tex]\gamma[/tex]m[tex]\mu[/tex](c-u)
I then unraveled the gamma, moved some stuff around, and squared both sides and got (m[tex]\pi[/tex]/m[tex]\mu[/tex])2=(c-v)2/(1-v2/c2)
I don't know if this is the right path, but I have tried many different methods from this point and nothing seems to get any closer to what I need. Thanks for any help.

You seem to have dropped a factor of [itex]c^2[/itex];

[tex]m_{\pi}c=\gamma m_{\mu}(c-u)=\left(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}\right)^{-1/2}m_{\mu}(c-u)[/tex]

[tex]\implies m_{\pi}^2c^2= \left(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}\right)^{-1}m_{\mu}^2(c-u)^2[/tex]

[tex]\implies c^2-u^2=\left(\frac{m_{\mu}}{m_{\pi}}\right)^2(c-u)^2[/tex]

From here, just expand [itex](u-c)^2[/itex], group terms in powers of [itex]u[/itex] and solve via the quadratic formula (studying university physics is no excuse for forgetting high school algebra!:wink:)
 
I think you started out with way too complicated algebra, by considering the 3-mometum separately. Also, you should use c = 1 units to avoid making mistakes with factors of c.

The simple way to soleve these sorts of problems is to use the energy momentum relation in the form:

p^2 = m^2

where p is the four-momentum, the square denotes the Lorentz inner product of the momentum with itself and m is the mass. By bringing the four-momentum of the particle in which you are not interested in to one side and squaring, you eliminate its momentum and energy in one go. So, in this case, you would proceed like:

p_neut = p_pi - p_mu

0 = m_pi^2 + m_mu^2 - 2 m_pi E_mu

Then solving for E_mu and dividing by m_mu gives you the gamma factor and you're done.
 
eh I was up all night doing this so it was no doubt the fatigue, but I got to that point once and gave up(talking to gabba). I haven't been taught the four-momentum process so I can't use it unfortunately.

Thanks you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K