Schools Master in Quantitative Finance before going to physics Grad School?

AI Thread Summary
A one-year Master's program in quantitative finance offers a quick path to a high-paying job without GREs or application essays, which is appealing for an undergrad in physics and applied math. However, concerns arise about whether this degree could negatively impact chances for graduate school in physics. Completing both the Master's and undergraduate degree in the same year is feasible, but the cost and reputation of the program should be considered, as many are viewed as degree mills. A Physics PhD may provide greater long-term earning potential and skills relevant to Wall Street compared to a Master's in quantitative finance. Ultimately, gaining research experience may be more beneficial for physics grad school applications than pursuing the Master's at this time.
edenstar
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am considering doing a one year Masters Program at my school in quantitative finance because:
  • It is a very good program that is offered at my school which I could get into without taking any GRE's qualifying exams, or even application essays
  • It would allow me get a relatively high paying job later in life most likely if I wanted
  • I could complete it in my fourth year of undergrad
  • I am pretty interested in learning more about it
However, I am also very interested in going to grad school for physics (maybe applied mathematics). I am wondering if getting this masters could somehow hurt my chances for physics grad school. I am an undergrad Physics and Applied math major with a reasonable chance of going to grad school for physics. I am thinking that because physics is a higher priority, I should focus on making myself a more appealing candidate for grad school in my final year. On the other hand, this masters seems like a pretty good opportunity. Any advice is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Here are my thoughts:

IF you can complete your 4th year of undergrad AND complete this masters (In the same year) - then by all means go for it. You aren't losing any time.

But things to consider - Is that program free for you? Those masters in quantitative finance programs are EXTREMELY expensive. And honestly from what I hear they are mainly degree mills. It matters much more where you go for that masters in quantitative finance than many other degrees. Because the point is to meet people while you do it and network.

A Physics PhD that goes to Wall St has just as much earnings potential as a Masters in Quantitative Finance in my humble opinion. And I would argue way more potential due to the added skills that a Physics PhD has. Physics PhDs run Wall St, Masters in Quantitative Finance people work for them. Meaning if you get a Physics PhD, it's almost redundant. And you will learn much more with the PhD.

I don't think having this masters would hurt your chances of getting into a grad school for physics if you did it in the same year while you were still in undergrad. I do however think that a year of research will go farther in getting you into a top notch physics grad school than this irrelevant masters.

You can always do the masters in quantitative finance after the PhD in Physics if you really want it...

Just some things for you to consider :) Again, these are my opinions, I'm not working on Wall St obviously, but I have read up a little on Physics PhD vs Masters in QF just incase I want to explore that route some day...
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top