Mastering Integrals: How to Solve the Integral of x^4*tan^-1(x) with Ease

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarrenLockyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
AI Thread Summary
The integral of x^4 * tan^-1(x) can be approached using integration by parts. One suggested method involves letting u = tan^-1(x) and dv = x^4 dx, which may simplify the integration process. It's important to show any attempted work to facilitate better assistance. The discussion emphasizes the need for a structured approach when tackling complex integrals. Engaging with the problem through integration by parts is a recommended strategy for solving this integral.
DarrenLockyer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey i was wondering if anyone knew how to do:
The integral of : x^4*tan^-1 dx??

Im rater stuck on how to do it. plez help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DarrenLockyer said:
Hey i was wondering if anyone knew how to do:
The integral of : x^4*tan^-1 dx??

Im rater stuck on how to do it. plez help

How can you say you are stuck and not show any work at all? If you are stuck then you must have tried something! What have you tried and why didn't it work.

Have you tried integration by parts at all?

Normally, when I see a power of x times another function, say \int x^n f(x)dx I think of u= xn, dv= f(x)dx so that integration by parts will reduce the power of x. Here, however, tan-1(x) looks difficult to integrate so try the other way around. If u= tan-1(x) and dv= x4dx, what do you get?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top