Mastering Logarithms: Simplifying Logarithmic Expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter theintarnets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the expression (log34 + log29)² - (log34 - log29)² without a calculator. Participants suggest using the identity a² - b² = (a + b)(a - b) to simplify the problem. One user correctly identifies that the expression simplifies to 4AB, where A = log34 and B = log29, leading to the conclusion that the answer should be 16. There is some confusion regarding changing the base of logarithms, but ultimately, the correct approach is confirmed. The final solution involves recognizing that the logarithmic expressions can be manipulated to yield the expected result of 16.
theintarnets
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate without a calculator:
(log34 + log29)2 - (log34 - log29)2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


(log34 + log29)2 - (log34 - log29)2

(2log32 + 2log23)2 - (2log32 - 2log23)2

And now I'm stuck...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
theintarnets said:

The Attempt at a Solution


(log34 + log29)2 / (log34 - log29)2

(2log34 + 2log29) / (2log34 - 2log29)

And now I'm stuck...

You went from a minus to a divide, I think you confused it with log(a/b)= loga-logb

Try using this fact a2-b2 = (a+b)(a-b).
 
a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)EDIT: how to delete message
 
theintarnets said:
(log34 + log29)2 / (log34 - log29)2

(2log34 + 2log29) / (2log34 - 2log29)
It also looks like you went from
(log34 + log29)2
to
(log342 + log292),
which is not true.
 
Ohhhhh, I see. I shall re-attempt now. Thanks.
 
Hmmm. I think it's simpler than that, guys -
Setting A = log34 and B = log29

(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)

...

and later on using that lognxk = k.lognx
and that logab \times logbc = logac
 
Erm...Nevermind. I'm still stuck. Can someone walk me through it please?

Edit: I totally forgot about factoring. I'll try that, thanks!
 
try this (A+B)^2 - (A-B)^2 = X^2 - Y^2 = ( X + Y ) ( X - Y )

where X=(A+B) and Y=(A-B)

and you get (A+B)^2 - (A-B)^2 =(2A) (2B) = 4AB
 
Okay one of my friends just told me to try changing the base. I did that, and now I have a giant mess on my hands. I have

(ln2*ln4 + ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 - (ln2*ln4 - ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 and somehow I'm supposed to get 16 from all of that. I'm not really sure how...
 
  • #10
theintarnets said:
Okay one of my friends just told me to try changing the base. I did that, and now I have a giant mess on my hands. I have

(ln2*ln4 + ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 - (ln2*ln4 - ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 and somehow I'm supposed to get 16 from all of that. I'm not really sure how...

No, no, NO! Don't change the base at the beginning. Do what Joffan suggested. You can change the base much later if you really want to.
 
  • #11
Okie. Trying again now.

Edit: I just can't seem to do it no matter what I try :(
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Show us what you have so far.
 
  • #13
Well I tried applying this:
Setting A = log34 and B = log29
(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)
The A2's and B2's will cancel out leaving me with 4AB which would be

4(log34 * log29)

The answer in the book says I'm supposed to get 16. I tried changing the base to get
4(ln4*ln9 / ln3*ln2)
I think I could maybe do 4(2ln2*2ln3 / ln3*ln2) but I'm not sure if that's correct. I think then maybe the ln2's and ln3's would cancel out leaving me with 4(2*2) which would be 16. But I'm not sure if that's correct.
 
  • #14
theintarnets said:
Well I tried applying this:
Setting A = log34 and B = log29
(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)
The A2's and B2's will cancel out leaving me with 4AB which would be

4(log34 * log29)

The answer in the book says I'm supposed to get 16. I tried changing the base to get
4(ln4*ln9 / ln3*ln2)
I think I could maybe do 4(2ln2*2ln3 / ln3*ln2) but I'm not sure if that's correct. I think then maybe the ln2's and ln3's would cancel out leaving me with 4(2*2) which would be 16. But I'm not sure if that's correct.
That's correct.
 
  • #15
Yay! Thanks so much everyone!
 
  • #16
Also, if you didn't want to change base,
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> log_34 \times log_29 &amp; = log_32^2 \times log_23^2\\<br /> &amp;= 2log_32 \times 2log_23\\<br /> &amp;= 4(log_32.log_23)\\<br /> &amp;= 4(log_33) \\<br /> &amp;=4<br /> \end{align}<br />
 
Back
Top