Matched Asymptotic ODE Solution for ##\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0##

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
member 428835

Homework Statement


Solve to order ##\epsilon## $$\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0$$ subject to ##|f(0)|<\infty## and ##f(1)=1## via matched asymptotic expansions.

Homework Equations


Nothing comes to mind.

The Attempt at a Solution


Perform a matched asymptotic analysis. In this case when I take a series expansion $$f = \sum \epsilon^nf_n$$ the governing ODE yields the following two weighted equations $$xf_0=0\\
d_xf_0 - xf_1 + xd^2_x f_0=0.
$$
Notice the first equation implies ##f_0=0##. This is where I am stuck. Any help?

For the inner part I believe an appropriate substitution is ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)##, but I thought this change of coordinates was typically introduced after first making an expansion and solving for the outer part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should this really read ##d_f## in your formula?
 
  • Like
Likes member 428835
Thanks, just fixed that!
 
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
 
DrDu said:
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
It's a little unclear to me, but what are you suggesting? Typically I would guess ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)## and weight ##g## to balance any two terms I'd like, so something like ##g=\epsilon^n##. However, I would only do this after computing the outer part, which as I showed in post 1, isn't giving good results ##f_0=f_1=0##.

Any ideas?
 
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
 
DrDu said:
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
That's interesting. I suppose I'm not sure why I don't transform both. Have anything in mind?
 
Back
Top