Matched Asymptotic ODE Solution for ##\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0##

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving the differential equation $$\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0$$ using matched asymptotic expansions, with boundary conditions specified at two points. The subject area pertains to ordinary differential equations and asymptotic analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the series expansion of the function $$f$$ and the implications of the resulting equations. There is a focus on the distinction between inner and outer solutions, with some questioning the appropriateness of power series in $$\epsilon$$. Others explore the transformation of variables and the timing of such transformations in relation to solving the outer part.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning assumptions about the method of matched asymptotic expansions. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several lines of reasoning are being explored regarding the transformations and the nature of the inner and outer solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the boundary conditions and the potential need for different transformations based on the behavior of the series expansion. There is uncertainty regarding the appropriate form of the series and the implications of the equations derived from the original differential equation.

member 428835

Homework Statement


Solve to order ##\epsilon## $$\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0$$ subject to ##|f(0)|<\infty## and ##f(1)=1## via matched asymptotic expansions.

Homework Equations


Nothing comes to mind.

The Attempt at a Solution


Perform a matched asymptotic analysis. In this case when I take a series expansion $$f = \sum \epsilon^nf_n$$ the governing ODE yields the following two weighted equations $$xf_0=0\\
d_xf_0 - xf_1 + xd^2_x f_0=0.
$$
Notice the first equation implies ##f_0=0##. This is where I am stuck. Any help?

For the inner part I believe an appropriate substitution is ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)##, but I thought this change of coordinates was typically introduced after first making an expansion and solving for the outer part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should this really read ##d_f## in your formula?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
Thanks, just fixed that!
 
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
 
DrDu said:
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
It's a little unclear to me, but what are you suggesting? Typically I would guess ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)## and weight ##g## to balance any two terms I'd like, so something like ##g=\epsilon^n##. However, I would only do this after computing the outer part, which as I showed in post 1, isn't giving good results ##f_0=f_1=0##.

Any ideas?
 
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
 
DrDu said:
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
That's interesting. I suppose I'm not sure why I don't transform both. Have anything in mind?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K