Material Engineering - Metal Forming & Welding

AI Thread Summary
The lightweight bicycle frame, made from aluminum alloy tubing and initially bonded with adhesive, fractured near a joint after being repaired with gas tungsten arc welding. The second fracture occurred in the tube material, indicating that the weld itself was not the cause of failure. Cold drawn aluminum tubing may contain internal cracks that can lead to thermal cracking during welding. The primary issue is that the aluminum tubing lacks sufficient strength to withstand the imposed loads. Ultimately, the owner needs to consider a stronger bicycle frame to prevent future failures.
hafiz88a
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Lightweight bicycle had been fabricated from aluminium alloy tubing, with joints made by adhesive bonding. When the frame fractured near one of the joints, the owner requested that a repair be made using conventional gas tungsten arc welding. Shortly thereafter, the frame broke again. This time the fracture was adjacent to the repair weld and the the characteristics of the break were different. The first fracture was somewhat brittle in nature, the second fracture occurred in the tube material, not the weld itself.

Homework Equations



If the material had been cold drawn aluminium tubing (i.e. strain hardened), explain what might occurred during repair. What is the possible cause of the second fracture?

The Attempt at a Solution



Cold drawn products could have internal cracks which the heat from welding causes thermal cracks to occur.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fact that the second break occurred in the tube material and not the weld means the weld was not at fault, i.e. the weld was done properly.
The underlying problem is that the aluminum tubing is not strong enough to support the loads being imposed on it.
The owner is going to have to get a stronger bike.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top