Material/Fluid derivative operator questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the material derivative operator, which tracks the change of a fluid property, such as density, as it moves through space and time. It is derived using the chain rule, incorporating both partial derivatives and the velocity field of the fluid at each point. The material derivative is expressed as Df/Dt = ∂f/∂t + (u·∇)f, where u represents the velocity components in the x, y, and z directions. The conversation clarifies that the property of interest can be generalized as a function of spatial and temporal variables, f(ρ) = f(x,y,z,t). Understanding this operator is crucial for analyzing fluid dynamics effectively.
klawlor419
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/b/2/2b2fe1336915a03e04930c11b27f4585.png

The above link shows the material derivative. Which is the derivative that follows a volume of fluid throughout its movement through a fluid. How is this derived from a chain rule? Is the v in that equation the velocity field of the fluid at each point throughout space? Do you act on the position of some arbitrary fluid volume with this operator? Thanks ahead of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose you have a property of interest, say density.

This property varies in both space and time so f(ρ) = f(x,y,z,t).

We have to consider what we mean by the partial time derivative \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}}

This means the time variation of ρ at a fixed point in space (x,y,z t) since we hold x,y,z constant to take the partial derivative with respect to t.

If we want toconsider 'following' a parcel of fluid then we use the rate of change 'following the fluid' \frac{{Df}}{{Dt}}

This is derived as follows.


\frac{{Df}}{{Dt}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}}\frac{{dz}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} + u\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}} + v\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}} + w\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} + (u.\nabla )f

Does this help?
 
Studiot said:
Suppose you have a property of interest, say density.

This property varies in both space and time so f(ρ) = f(x,y,z,t).

We have to consider what we mean by the partial time derivative \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}}

This means the time variation of ρ at a fixed point in space (x,y,z t) since we hold x,y,z constant to take the partial derivative with respect to t.

If we want toconsider 'following' a parcel of fluid then we use the rate of change 'following the fluid' \frac{{Df}}{{Dt}}

This is derived as follows.


\frac{{Df}}{{Dt}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}}\frac{{dz}}{{dt}} + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} + u\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}} + v\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}} + w\frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}} = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial t}} + (u.\nabla )f

Does this help?

Thanks for the response. So you are saying that some function of a specific property we are interested in is a function of (x,y,z,t). "f(ρ) = f(x,y,z,t)". I would say that ρ=f(x,y,z,t), but I guess it is more general to state it as you did. Is this correct?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top