Materials Science for a Grad. Degree

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transition from a chemistry major with a math minor to a graduate degree in materials science. Participants emphasize the importance of a solid foundation in physics and mathematics, suggesting that students should take advanced courses in these subjects to enhance their understanding. Concerns about job outlooks and the nature of work in materials science are raised, with a consensus that the field offers rewarding opportunities for those dissatisfied with traditional chemistry roles. Additionally, frustrations regarding the lack of worked-out problems in physics courses highlight the need for better instructional methods to aid student learning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of materials science principles
  • Proficiency in advanced physics concepts
  • Strong mathematical skills, particularly calculus and linear algebra
  • Familiarity with graduate-level research methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research graduate programs in materials science, focusing on curriculum requirements
  • Explore advanced physics topics such as thermodynamics and quantum mechanics
  • Investigate mathematical techniques relevant to materials science, including differential equations
  • Learn about industry trends and job opportunities in materials science
USEFUL FOR

Students transitioning from chemistry to materials science, prospective graduate students, and educators seeking to improve physics teaching methodologies.

mrshappy0
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Any advice on a chem major/math minor going into materials science grad degree?

Most helpful curriculums?
How deep should you take physics/math in undergrad?
Job Outlooks/what kind of work expected?
Is it really a safe jump for a chem major?
Will it be easy to push away from chem and more into the physics/math stuff?

I find chemistry unsatisfying.. especially analytical/lab tech work.
I'm not very bright in math/physics but the material more rewarding at the end of the day.


Relevant side question:
Why do so many physics classes not supply a wealth of worked out problems?

Every time I go to study I slave over foolish mistakes that stop me from learning 10 x the material I could be learning.

I understand that problem solving is important in physics but I personally think that training students to see the methods of working through problems can be very effective rather than deliberately hiding them from the students. Maybe it's just my school, but we aren't even given the solutions after we get our corrected exams. This is baloney because not everyone has time to chase down the professor every time they have a question. Not to mention large classes and one professor makes it near impossible to get one-on-one help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem solving comes with practice. Spending class time to solve problems or go over homework is often wasteful. You should be able to look at your exams and figure out why your incorrect answers are wrong. Talk to other students if the professor is not available.
 
I completely agree that using class time for problem solving and homework is a waste of time.

I don't agree that students don't have access to solutions to completed homework/exams/quizzes. Sure talking to professors and other students is super important in training for the world of science but some students are more focused on learning physics in the early stages -- rather than playing social games.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K